With King Lear, I'm a bit lost with the concept of my own interpretation. Like, is that just how I view the play? Or how I'd stage it? Or....what? I'm confused.
Would it be right to say that my interpretation of the play is basically a feminist interpretation, not too dissimilar to that of McLuskie, and then talk about the main points of it? Or do I not need to reference to her?
Any help would be appreciated...
Would it be right to say that my interpretation of the play is basically a feminist interpretation, not too dissimilar to that of McLuskie, and then talk about the main points of it? Or do I not need to reference to her?
Any help would be appreciated...