S America launches trading bloc (1 Viewer)

Comrade nathan

Active Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2004
Messages
1,170
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2004
America launches trading bloc

South American countries are creating the third bloc in the world
Representatives from 12 South American countries have signed an agreement to create a political and economic bloc modelled on the European Union.
The new South American Community of Nations was launched at a summit in the Peruvian city of Cuzco.

Peruvian president Alejandro Toledo, said a new country was being born, which would one day have a common currency, parliament and passport.

Members of the new community will start by phasing out tariffs.

Leaders also hope it will increase South America's clout in international trade talks.

THE NEW BLOC
Territory: 17,658,000 sq km
Population: 361 million
GDP: $973bn
Exports: $181bn
Unemployment: 12% (Can); 12.9% (Mercosur); 8.5% (Chile)
Source: Can (2003)

Mr Toledo said the new community would also help member nations "confront the challenges of globalisation so that it is fairer".

"If in the past, geography divided us, today it unites us," Mr Toledo said.

The move will create a market of 361 million people with a GDP of $973bn, exporting $181bn of goods and services.

Stumbling blocs

But the BBC's Hannah Hennessy in Cuzco says details and disputes must be resolved if the bloc is to live up to expectations.

It is born from the convergence of the two main trade groups of the region - the Andean Community (Can) and Mercosur - as well as Chile, Surinam and Guyana.

The Can was created 35 years ago, but it still has not decided on common tariffs for its members.

Critics say that if existing blocs have not been able to achieve unity, this one stands little chance of doing so.


Poverty is one of the greatest challenges for the new bloc

There have also been criticisms that countries are putting their own interests first.

The presidents of Brazil, Venezuela, Peru, Colombia, Bolivia, Chile, Surinam and Guyana attended the summit.

The leaders of Argentina, Ecuador, Uruguay and Paraguay did not even bother attending the summit, sending envoys in their place.

Others left before the signing of the declaration.

In trade terms, there is also scepticism. Some analysts note that in many cases the South American countries export the same products.

The region's two biggest powers, Brazil and Argentina, are currently locked in trade disputes, while Bolivia and Chile have no diplomatic relations at all.

However former Argentine president Eduardo Duhalde brushed aside the sceptics, saying the new group would not only responded to a very old integration dream but also to modern requirements.

"Our countries cannot face alone the challenges of the new economic and political world order," said Mr Duhalde.

To emphasise this move towards greater integration, Peru and Brazil signed a $700m agreement to create a road linking the two countries to be finished by the end of his term in 2006.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4079505.stm
 

loquasagacious

NCAP Mooderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2004
Messages
3,636
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2004
And your opinion on this is?

I'm hypothesising here, but from your perspective I would see two things: the enacting of capitalist ideals and the embracing of globalisation/world trade - which could be construed as bad and on the other hand a collection of South (third world) countries uniting so as not to be exploited by developed nations.

From my own perspective as a general rule I approve of such unions and on this case I can see many advantages, though the historic instability of the region could prove to be a severe impediment - though were the US to stop interfeering instability would lessen. It does seem to hark back to the grand vision of Bolivar who fought colonial powers in south america - and won liberating his people. In short I think it is good.

I have to wonder about one thing: the article says this would be a third trading bloc, however given there is the EU, NAFTA and the ASEAN/APEC one wouldn't it be the fourth?
 

Comrade nathan

Active Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2004
Messages
1,170
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2004
My opinion is.May make trading fairer wich could see export prices the same over the continient for products but like the article said most of thoose countries export the same product so it may be failure. I havent had much to time to think about it really, but from first look it could create a stronger capitalist and middle class wich will improve working class standards.

From experinces of the EU it can be bad for the workers if one county is undeveloped then another country inflation and other issues cuase problems with international buiness moving production to other countires fro cheap labor. S. America seems to be in the same bag really the EU has rich countries like Spain England France and Germany. In S. America there really isnt much unequal development so who knows im not a expert on S.Americ., Chavez singed it and all this year he has been doing speaches agaisnt globalisation and US imperialism. He didnt want to sign FTA's so if he thinks its good and not harming it may be right

NAFTA Is just a free trade agreement, (North America Free Trade Agreement)
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top