MedVision ad

Space problem- orbital speed (1 Viewer)

Cookie182

Individui Superiore
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
1,484
Location
Global
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
hmm just lookin over sum past trials from my skool in order to prepare. Havent done orbital spped in ages and we barely did anythin in class on it.

Heres the question- i use the formula and stuff but i get an orbital speed of 6532.56 m/s (i think the formula gives it to u in m/s)

anywayz sounds too big for me

Here is the question-

Question 18- (3 marks)


A satellite has a mass of 250 kg and is orbiting the Earth at an altitude of 3000km. The Earth’s equatorial diameter is 12756 km.

(a) - Determine its orbital speed. (2 marks)









(b) – Compare the orbital speed of a 500 kg satellite in an identical orbit. (1mark)



I used the formula-


V= Sq root GM/r

this formula completely ignores the mass of the sateliite which they give u- i think to trick u- as all objects at the same altitude from the earth orbit at teh same speed independent of their mass i beleived. Anywayz sum 1 hav a go for us

thanxs
 

Forbidden.

Banned
Joined
Feb 28, 2006
Messages
4,436
Location
Deep trenches of burning HELL
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
For (a) I used v = √GM/r from
F = mv2/r = GmM/r2

r = 6378 km (Because r = d/2 plus altitude)
M = 5.98x1024 kg (Known value)
G = 6.67x1011 (Formula/Data Sheet)

v = √ 6.67x1011 x 5.98x1024 / (6378 + 3000)x103
v = 6521.663622 ...
v = 6521.7 ms-1


For (b) I say the orbital speed is still the same, the orbital velocity is only dependant on the radius on the same planet.
 

Cookie182

Individui Superiore
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
1,484
Location
Global
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
f3nr15 said:
For (a) I used v = √GM/r from
F = mv2/r = GmM/r2

r = 6378 km (Because r = d/2 plus altitude)
M = 5.98x1024 kg (Known value)
G = 6.67x1011 (Formula/Data Sheet)

v = √ 6.67x1011 x 5.98x1024 / (6378 + 3000)x103
v = 6521.663622 ...
v = 6521.7 ms-1


For (b) I say the orbital speed is still the same, the orbital velocity is only dependant on the radius on the same planet.

Thnxs dude- i got the same answer i guess it must be right. Geez seemed like a hell of a big number thats all- i mean 6521.7 in m/s is huge- iand i thought the further out u got the slower u orbited??

yea for (b) its definately the same as mass is irrelevant- plus its only a one marker.
 

Cookie182

Individui Superiore
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
1,484
Location
Global
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Its roughly 23478 km/h

i guess thats right as LEO which are about 200-300 km altitude do nearly 30000 km/h

very fast though for 3000km altiutude
 

xiao1985

Active Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2003
Messages
5,704
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
f3nr15 said:
Apparently the greater the orbital radius the greater the orbital velocity needed.
Slipped?

v = sqrt (GM/r)

i.e. greater the r, smaller the v .

=p
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top