• Want to take part in this year's BoS Trials event for Maths and/or Business Studies?
    Click here for details and register now!
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page

Speech: crit study (1 Viewer)

warto29

New Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
20
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
Anyone have a really good notes on socrates, king or lincoln ...
on context, content , or oration ....
 

Mountain.Dew

Magician, and Lawyer.
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
825
Location
Sydney, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
warto29 said:
Anyone have a really good notes on socrates, king or lincoln ...
on context, content , or oration ....
ive got some...here goes:

These are some notes on King's speech:
Martin Luther King – “I have a dream”

Context: August 28th 1963 * Summertime
Summer is a metaphor, a metaphor for the race riots…explosive atmosphere. The tension was mounting between the whites and the blacks. “the sweltering summer of our discontent”.

Where at: The Lincoln Memorial * to get more emotive say. It is symbolic; he uses it to remind America of what it should be.

Audience: 250,000. demanding, waiting for action to happen, waiting for their justice and their equality served.

The speech would have to be extraordinary to fulfil their political and social issues.

Speech aims to do 3 things:
* Pacify the audience
* Feed their expectations and enthusiasm
* It serves as a warning to government and the white people.

To appeal to the audience, it cannot be academic, or dry, or stayed. The audience doesn’t want any logic or reasoning. The speech, to be extraordinary, must be EMOTIVELY CHARGED. The whole speech must be packed with rhetorical devices.

This is a very evangelist style* prophetic, biblical language, emotionally charged, serves as an inspiration to the people.

In the beginning, a very hallowed and reverend tone. He echoes Lincoln’s words * Emancipation Proclamation * adds credibility to his argument, the basis for his ideals, a springboard to launch his emotionally charged words towards the audience.

The check * was a promise, a pledge, to the negro people. Still cant access the ‘great vaults of opportunity’ with this check. This emphasises the magnitude of discrimination of African Americans in America at the time, and still is today.

Repetition of “100 years…” compounds the racial injustice received by the black Americans.

Continues to create a rapport with slavery imagery * inflames the audience.

Inflammatory language such as: “chains of discrimination”, “manacles of segregation”. Oxymoron serves to stir tension and highlight the lack of balance in America.

His rhetoric is effective not so as to invoke a huge riot, but it instills guilt to the oppressor, but keeps the discontent and the resistance bubbling away.

Religious imagery: fire: seared in the flames of withering injustice.
Light imagery: ‘beacon light of hope’…contrasted with the ‘night of captivity’ contrasting now and later. A dichotomy to continue to accentuate the plight of the black Americans.

In the beginning, it was very formal, planned, well structured. But, as the speech progressed, the audience began to be more vigorous, so King capitalized on the opportunity, using more and more extravagant and religious imagery, to fuel the mounting passion.

Wants to beat the sweltering summer wit the autumn of freedom and inequality. Personification of the seasons, a parallel from sweltering heat to dry coolness.

Most important: the compounding repetition of I have a Dream. The speech, using this compound anaphora and equipped with constantly streaming penetrating imagery, the delivery is an orchestration to manipulate the dynamic nature of the crowd. Then, these imageries ring out more clearly and more powerfully than ever.

“Let freedom ring…” has a resonating effect, an echoing effect with the audience, further utilising the religious element of the bell, tolling its cry for equality. Like the bells, the messages against racism, especially against African Americans still rings clear today, who are still not as equally treated as white Americans are. This can also be applied to racism in general, and with increasing multiculturalism around the world, this speech certainly advocates the right message.


enjoy!
 

Mountain.Dew

Magician, and Lawyer.
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
825
Location
Sydney, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Socrates:

This was an extract from the actual essay I wrote for my half yearlies in 05.

The Socrates speech aims to voice his philosophical views, of the right to free speech without oppression, of virtue over material possession, and, as the title suggests, “No evil can happen” to such an honourable man, like Socrates himself. His affinity ingredient is using tight logic and sound reasoning to appeal the highly polytheistic, disciplined Athenian values of the jury, to convince them that he is a reasonable, honourable man unworthy to undergo trial. The anti-thesis “Virtue springs not from possessions, but from virtue springs possessions” is one such example to demonstrate Socrates’ value of morality over material wealth, a quality that defines Athenian democracy at the time. He presents himself as a light-hearted fellow, the “gadfly” humour a welcoming, uplifting relief to the atmosphere of the courtroom. He appeals to a higher authority, that “I am attached by God to this city”, and “to God, to judge me as seemeth best for me and for you.” It is his light hearted tone and his appeal to a higher authority that etches the impression that the Athenians are convicting a reasonable and honourable man. The irony in “I to die, and you to live. Which is better God only knows” serves to see Socrates’ surrender to God and posterity, to the demise of his accusers, further elevating Socrates’ moral position and undermining his accusers in court. This man seems capable of laughing at his death. His successfulness of his affinity ingredient came when “I did not think the majority would be so little”, highlighting the effectiveness of his key ingredient to sway the decision of jurors. His proposed values of morality over material wealth and the right to free speech still rings clear today, through the code of gentlemanly conduct and free speech.

its not perfect, still have some minor flaws, but I hope theres some stuff there that is useful to extract.

 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top