• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

The New High Court Appointment is..... (1 Viewer)

erawamai

Retired. Gone fishing.
Joined
Sep 26, 2004
Messages
1,456
Location
-
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2002
Interesting. Never heard of her.

The Federal Court's Susan Kenny, Susan Crennan, Catherine Branson and Annabelle Bennett would have claims to be in Justice McHugh's top 10, with Carmel McLure (Western Australia), Ruth McColl (NSW), Margaret Beazley (NSW), and Marilyn Warren, the Chief Justice of Victoria.

If the Government does not opt for a woman to replace Justice McHugh it will be two years until the next opportunity.

Ian Callinan reaches the retirement age of 70 in September 2007, followed by the Chief Justice, Murray Gleeson (August 2008) and Michael Kirby (March 2009). An announcement on Justice McHugh's successor is expected by mid-October, and the Prime Minister will have a big say.
Jeepers. How are going to replace kirby!? ;)
 
Last edited:

townie

Premium Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2004
Messages
9,646
Location
Gladesville
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Uni Grad
2009
i think she was one of the female candidates mentioned by many, and she does seem to have merit...she's 60, so 10 years max on the court, which is good

edit: i cant find much info on her, is she conservative, middle, liberal ??
 

erawamai

Retired. Gone fishing.
Joined
Sep 26, 2004
Messages
1,456
Location
-
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2002
She has certainly been going up rather fast. Seems like Ruddock likes her.

R050/2003

19 December 2003
NEW JUDGE APPOINTED TO FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Melbourne barrister Mrs Susan Crennan QC has been appointed a judge of the Federal Court of Australia, Attorney-General Philip Ruddock announced today.

Mrs Crennan has practised as a barrister since 1979. She commenced her career at the New South Wales Bar, where she read with the present Solicitor-General for the Commonwealth, Mr D M J Bennett QC.

Mrs Crennan currently practises at the Victorian Bar where she specialises in the areas of administrative law, commercial law, constitutional law and intellectual property.

Mrs Crennan was appointed as a Queen's Counsel in 1989. She was Chair of the Victorian Bar Council from 1993 to 1994 and President of the Australian Bar Association from 1994 to 1995.

She takes up her appointment on 3 February 2004 and will be based in Melbourne.

Her appointment follows the retirement of Justice Douglas Drummond from the Brisbane registry of the Federal Court earlier this year.

"I welcome Mrs Crennan to the judiciary and look forward to the further positive contribution to the law I am sure she will make in her new capacity," Mr Ruddock said.

Mr Ruddock said that the appointment of Mrs Crennan in Melbourne reflected the heavy workload of the Court in Melbourne.

"This demonstrates the desire of the Government and the Court to be flexible in making new appointments to ensure that resources are directed to the areas of most need," Mr Ruddock said.
Was a former HREOC comissioner - 1992 to 1997

http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/12/08/1038950270361.html

Speeches she has given at umel graduation.

http://www.unimelb.edu.au/speeches/graduations.html

----------

BA (English lit) Melbourne, LLB Sydney Uni

Brief bio

http://www.trinity.unimelb.edu.au/news/media/2004/20040901-Intro.pdf

---------

She is catholic.
 
Last edited:

MoonlightSonata

Retired
Joined
Aug 17, 2002
Messages
3,645
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
Redressing balance on scale of the justices

By Richard Ackland
September 21, 2005


With five out of seven of the current members of the High Court of Australia coming from the Sydney bar it was important for the health of the federal compact to secure a suitable lawyer to replace Justice Michael McHugh from outside that particular breeding ground.

The sniggers about the High Court of Sydney otherwise might take on an even more bitter edge in other corners of the federation.

Yet, Justice Susan Crennan, who is to move from the Federal Court, sitting in Melbourne, to the High Court, has Sydney stamped large on her psyche.

She graduated from the University of Sydney law school and she practised at the Sydney bar. So while Justice Crennan has spent much of her career in Melbourne, as we all know it's impossible to entirely shake off the Sydney imprint.

Nonetheless this is a most interesting appointment - far from a male industrial barrister with a lucrative employers' practice, as was the anticipation, we're to have a woman who taught English literature and has a post-graduate diploma in history.

Her legal expertise is in the field of intellectual property. Yet she has appeared frequently in the High Court on family law, criminal and constitutional cases.

The word from Liberal Party lawyers was that the Attorney-General, Philip Ruddock, was keen to find a well-credentialled woman for the vacancy, while the Prime Minister was not quite so wedded to the gender factor, but saw the importance of a Victorian appointment.

- SMH
Ex-teacher, legal dynamo and, oh yes, a woman: welcome to the High Court

By Michael Pelly Legal Reporter
September 21, 2005


Don't tell Susan Crennan her appointment to the High Court is a victory for women.

When she was first touted for judicial office a decade ago, the Victorian said the feminists had it wrong when they complained about the paucity of women lawyers or surgeons. They wanted to play a blame game, when there were "biological imperatives" and huge demands on those who combined career and family.

"You make sacrifices. I don't think I've spent enough time with my children [she has three] over the years," she said in 1992.

"I've got a housekeeper and I see that as spreading my income around … The feminists wouldn't like that either because you're getting someone else doing your housework. They'd rather see the men doing it."

Other attempts to categorise the second woman appointed to the High Court will fail. "She can't be pigeonholed," the Commonwealth Solicitor General, David Bennett, QC, said yesterday.

His reaction was a recurring theme - she was a fine lawyer full stop. Not a woman lawyer. Not a black-letter lawyer. Not a leftie. Not a conservative. Not an Anglo-Celtic private school type who had done nothing but law.

The appointment of Justice Crennan, 60, who has been on the Federal Court for only 19 months, will nonetheless quell the disquiet over the fact that Mary Gaudron had been the only woman on the High Court.

Justice Crennan is a grandmother and a former teacher who turned to law after meeting her husband, Michael, himself a senior counsel. Her first job as a barrister was reading with Mr Bennett in Sydney in 1979 - when she was 34. "I thought she was good but you don't think someone will go that far," he said.

Within 10 years she was a Queen's counsel - a time frame reserved only for the exceptional. She achieved wider notoriety when she was counsel assisting the Victorian Government in the Tricontinental financial inquiry, which lasted two years. She was the first woman to chair the Victorian Bar Council, and the first female president of the Australian Bar Association. She served for six years as a federal human rights commissioner.

A former head of Pyramid Building Society, Bill Farrow, described what it was like to face her in court. "It's a bit like being picked for fullback against Gary Ablett … possibly [Garry] Hocking and a few others as well."

Justice Crennan's appointment was announced by the Attorney-General, Philip Ruddock, yesterday. She will replace Justice Michael McHugh, who challenged the Government last month to appoint a woman when he reached the retirement age of 70 on November 1.

But Mr Ruddock said he was appointing "the best person for the job" and that she would "make an outstanding member of the High Court regardless of gender".

Victorian barrister Kate McMillan, SC, said Justice Crennan was one of the last generalists - those who can tackle almost any area of law.

She joins Frank Gavan Duffy and Garfield Barwick as the oldest appointees to the court, where she will renew some old aquaintances. At Sydney University she was taught by Dyson Heydon and Bill Gummow, now two of the court's seven justices.

She has made few speeches, but at her inauguration in February last year, she acknowledged the view of the Chief Justice, Murray Gleeson, that "we live in a rights-conscious age".

Mr Bennett said he believed Justice Crennan would "bring a very great sense of balance to the court … She is very balanced; she does not have any great baggage or any biases."

He once described her as "not at all a frivolous young person" but those who have seen her beating a bodhran at her St Patrick's Day parties might think otherwise.

Indeed, Ms McMillan describes her as "a great stick".

"She has a great sense of humour. She will share a joke and they do like to celebrate the Irish national day." She said Justice Crennan was a beacon for the modern women who wanted to have it all, but not for those advocating affirmative action.

Justice Crennan said: "The problem with being a female barrister is that you don't have a wife. The wives of barristers do a terrific job. If they've got six kids and the husband wants to work three nights a week and one day on the weekend, well there's someone minding the children."

- SMH
..........
 

Minai

Alumni
Joined
Jul 7, 2002
Messages
7,458
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2002
Uni Grad
2006
Seems the High Court can't resist Sydney Uni grads still.
Nevertheless, she sounds like the best person for the job
 

erawamai

Retired. Gone fishing.
Joined
Sep 26, 2004
Messages
1,456
Location
-
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2002
Minai said:
Seems the High Court can't resist Sydney Uni grads still.
In preference to?

It will be standstone unis for a little while longer. UNSW/Monash etc didn't start putting out grads until the late 70s.

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,16671567%5E601,00.html

A BLACK-letter lawyer with close links to the Solicitor-General has been elevated to the nation's highest court, becoming only the second woman appointed to the role in its 102-year history.

The Government yesterday announced the appointment of Susan Maree Crennan, a protege of John Howard ally Solicitor-General David Bennett QC, to replace retiring moderate judge Michael McHugh on the High Court.

It is the Howard Government's fifth appointment to the seven-member bench and ensures a conservative High Court well into the future.

Attorney-General Philip Ruddock surprised most pundits yesterday by naming Justice Crennan, 60, a woman with limited experience on the bench and in federal constitutional law.
 
Last edited:
X

xeuyrawp

Guest
erawamai said:
In preference to?

It will be standstone unis for a little while longer. UNSW/Monash etc didn't start putting out grads until the late 70s.

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,16671567%5E601,00.html
Of course, it's a practical matter. A HC Justice would have generally gone into law at an early age and would have had a lot of experience. Someone graduating from anywhere but USyd or Melbourne is not going to fit that bill for a couple of years.
 
X

xeuyrawp

Guest
Minai said:
Melby's? WA'ers?

Hmm, I wonder, if in about 20-30 years time we'll have a High Court with a predominantly Asian background
If they fit the bill, of course they should. There's another matter that interpretation of the law is a part of a HCJ job, and why shouldn't that interpretation come from a background which reperesents the majority of Australia?
 

MoonlightSonata

Retired
Joined
Aug 17, 2002
Messages
3,645
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
Minai said:
Hmm, I wonder, if in about 20-30 years time we'll have a High Court with a predominantly Asian background
lol that won't happen, the government would never do it. Besides, judges are typically drawn from the top barristers and there are very few asian barristers

Realistically anything remotely like that scenario would take about 100 years, for the asian generations to start moving up the legal food chain.

I don't know if we even have an asian judge at all yet =/
 

erawamai

Retired. Gone fishing.
Joined
Sep 26, 2004
Messages
1,456
Location
-
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2002
MoonlightSonata said:
lol that won't happen, the government would never do it. Besides, judges are typically drawn from the top barristers and there are very few asian barristers

Realistically anything remotely like that scenario would take about 100 years, for the asian generations to start moving up the legal food chain.

I don't know if we even have an asian judge at all yet =/
Not for some time. The undercurrent of culture in Australia still fears an Asian invasion legally through immigration or by a real invasion. It is relfected in our foreign policy and if you look close enough it reflected in day to day life. We also fear the loss of the 'Australian culture'. Again no one really knows what the hell that is. It is very hard to pin down. But most people have an idea of what is and what is not Australian. Having Asian judges, regardless of whether they were born here, will not happen just yet.

Daily Telegraph heading 'HSC kids pay for tutors to do their homework' - READS: asian kids who work to hard and get high marks are really not as smart as you think. They cheat (well like the 10 the Daily tele caught).

However in the current generation there are many more kids born in Australia of non white background of feel that they are Australian. This generation perhaps may see some 'asian' judges. Well maybe perhaps 'asian' judges is the wrong way to say it. But judges who are of an asian background. Hopefully it will will be as much of a non issue as whether a judge is catholic or protestant.

Australian law is anglo saxon. I think it would be difficult for someone not born to have not grown up in a common law nation to be able be a judge.
 
Last edited:

ManlyChief

Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2005
Messages
438
Location
Manly: 7 miles from Sydney, 1000 miles from care
Gender
Male
HSC
2002
erawamai said:
In preference to?

It will be standstone unis for a little while longer. UNSW/Monash etc didn't start putting out grads until the late 70s.
But there are far more unis than USyd and UMelb that have been producing law graduates for more than 40 years:

UAdelaide
ANU
UQueensland
UWA
UTasmania
... and I'm sure there are more that I can't remember.
 

erawamai

Retired. Gone fishing.
Joined
Sep 26, 2004
Messages
1,456
Location
-
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2002
ManlyChief said:
But there are far more unis than USyd and UMelb that have been producing law graduates for more than 40 years:

UAdelaide
ANU
UQueensland
UWA
UTasmania
... and I'm sure there are more that I can't remember.
I guess the power has always been on the East Coast. I believe Justice Callinan is from UQ.

ANU is only 20 years older than unsw/monash etc (1950s?).
 
Last edited:

ManlyChief

Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2005
Messages
438
Location
Manly: 7 miles from Sydney, 1000 miles from care
Gender
Male
HSC
2002
erawamai said:
I guess the power has always been on the East Coast. I believe Justice Callinan is from UQ.

ANU is only 20 years older than the sandstone (1950s?).
Yes, and that's the problem with the appointments - 6/7 coming from NSW/Vic - if we want a bench that is 'representative' there should be more than a toke attempt at appointing judges from other states.

ANU's law school was founded in 1960 I believe. :)
 

Iron

Ecclesiastical Die-Hard
Joined
Jul 14, 2004
Messages
7,765
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Have mandatory state representation in the high court!? Turn it into the unrepresentative swill that is the Senate? Have you taken leave of your senses?
 

ManlyChief

Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2005
Messages
438
Location
Manly: 7 miles from Sydney, 1000 miles from care
Gender
Male
HSC
2002
Iron said:
Have mandatory state representation in the high court!? Turn it into the unrepresentative swill that is the Senate? Have you taken leave of your senses?
Not mandatory. However, anything would be better than the High Court of New South Wales and Victoria we now have. (For the purposes of this comment, let's say Callinan doesn't count.)
 
X

xeuyrawp

Guest
ManlyChief said:
Not mandatory. However, anything would be better than the High Court of New South Wales and Victoria we now have. (For the purposes of this comment, let's say Callinan doesn't count.)
You mean the Supreme Court?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top