irnie
life is a dance floor
it seems like no one is doing a topic similar to mine and other teachers i've spoken aren't very familiar with the topic area and im dying for some feedback from others on how to improve things... so here's my intro....
“That which is static and repetitive is boring. That which is dynamic and random is confusing. In between lies art.”
The first few times I stepped into art galleries, it was done in vain. I wanted desperately to be enculturated into this fascinating world of high culture. But then, when I began to study art theory at high school and thus began to grasp the ideas and notions of conceptual art, I naively thought I was having the lid to this cookie jar opened for me. The next time I visited a gallery, I thought to myself (viewing boundless art- from political propaganda to blatant statements about the flaws of our society), “Wow… how the times have changed. We can step into an epitome of ‘high culture’ and view statements about the acceptance of alternate sexual lifestyles, murder, the psychological, even pedophilia”. But the truth was I was still living in vanity, viewing this world from behind a façade.
I began to discover the somewhat illusive inner workings of this upper echelon of culture. And I began to think that the art viewed by the general public, in fact doesn’t make a statement about society as a whole and their perceptions, but in reality, reflects the views of those in positions of power and authority i.e. the various decision makers in the agencies of the art world.
Four years have passed, yet there remains this vivid enigma in my head; does the public art we view reflect the values and beliefs of our society, or, is the way that art is viewed by the general public shaped by the different agencies (i.e. art critics, curators, historians, media and the institution) of the art world?
This PIP aims to explore the inner workings of this ‘high culture’ and either prove or disprove my hypothesis, “Art reflects the values and beliefs of society”. It is important to consider the relationship between society and art as it is a part of cultural life. The type of art in which the research deals is the visual art of “gallery” nature, rather than music, dance and theatre arts. My personal objective is to prove my suspicion that the art viewed by the general public is influenced, dictated, if not controlled, by the roles of art critics, curators, historians, institutions and the media. Through my research of this social issue, I am ultimately interested to discover whether the society we live in is constantly being moulded by institutional forces and the measureless sources of power and authority, even through the arts. I will be examining this issue by navigating through four case studies: ‘Blue Poles’, the ‘Archibald Prize’, the ‘Art Gallery of New South Wales’ and ‘Regional Galleries’.
The methodologies employed for this social research will include secondary content analysis of media articles and various reports, a small survey regarding whether art has evolved from high culture status to popular culture status, and a number of interviews- encompassing the different agencies of the art world.
Altogether, the triangulation of these methodologies serve to give my research a balance, between levels of public knowledge, cross-cultural personal experience and findings relevant to local, national and global trends.
what ya think?
“That which is static and repetitive is boring. That which is dynamic and random is confusing. In between lies art.”
The first few times I stepped into art galleries, it was done in vain. I wanted desperately to be enculturated into this fascinating world of high culture. But then, when I began to study art theory at high school and thus began to grasp the ideas and notions of conceptual art, I naively thought I was having the lid to this cookie jar opened for me. The next time I visited a gallery, I thought to myself (viewing boundless art- from political propaganda to blatant statements about the flaws of our society), “Wow… how the times have changed. We can step into an epitome of ‘high culture’ and view statements about the acceptance of alternate sexual lifestyles, murder, the psychological, even pedophilia”. But the truth was I was still living in vanity, viewing this world from behind a façade.
I began to discover the somewhat illusive inner workings of this upper echelon of culture. And I began to think that the art viewed by the general public, in fact doesn’t make a statement about society as a whole and their perceptions, but in reality, reflects the views of those in positions of power and authority i.e. the various decision makers in the agencies of the art world.
Four years have passed, yet there remains this vivid enigma in my head; does the public art we view reflect the values and beliefs of our society, or, is the way that art is viewed by the general public shaped by the different agencies (i.e. art critics, curators, historians, media and the institution) of the art world?
This PIP aims to explore the inner workings of this ‘high culture’ and either prove or disprove my hypothesis, “Art reflects the values and beliefs of society”. It is important to consider the relationship between society and art as it is a part of cultural life. The type of art in which the research deals is the visual art of “gallery” nature, rather than music, dance and theatre arts. My personal objective is to prove my suspicion that the art viewed by the general public is influenced, dictated, if not controlled, by the roles of art critics, curators, historians, institutions and the media. Through my research of this social issue, I am ultimately interested to discover whether the society we live in is constantly being moulded by institutional forces and the measureless sources of power and authority, even through the arts. I will be examining this issue by navigating through four case studies: ‘Blue Poles’, the ‘Archibald Prize’, the ‘Art Gallery of New South Wales’ and ‘Regional Galleries’.
The methodologies employed for this social research will include secondary content analysis of media articles and various reports, a small survey regarding whether art has evolved from high culture status to popular culture status, and a number of interviews- encompassing the different agencies of the art world.
Altogether, the triangulation of these methodologies serve to give my research a balance, between levels of public knowledge, cross-cultural personal experience and findings relevant to local, national and global trends.
what ya think?