Hello there,
Just two questions I'd like to ask:
1. With the format of the second Personalities question being a higher order verb, how do I go about answering a question that has is based around the views of historians e.g I was asked a question in my half yearly that went along the lines of " how do historians support the fact that this person achieved this and that...I hope you can kinda understand what Im getting at. Do I have too specifically talk about the views of textbooks and other sources that I have studied on this personallity and include specific quotes from these sources to back-up my argument? I'll try and repost this in different words if no one can understand what I mean.
2. If anyone is doing Zhu De as their personallity, would you kindly PM if you have any resources that we could share, as their is not much on this person in terms of resources.
Thanks.
Just two questions I'd like to ask:
1. With the format of the second Personalities question being a higher order verb, how do I go about answering a question that has is based around the views of historians e.g I was asked a question in my half yearly that went along the lines of " how do historians support the fact that this person achieved this and that...I hope you can kinda understand what Im getting at. Do I have too specifically talk about the views of textbooks and other sources that I have studied on this personallity and include specific quotes from these sources to back-up my argument? I'll try and repost this in different words if no one can understand what I mean.
2. If anyone is doing Zhu De as their personallity, would you kindly PM if you have any resources that we could share, as their is not much on this person in terms of resources.
Thanks.