Maybe he was referring to the optimisation of the parts.. e.g getting the critical components right so that there's minimal bottleneck. In that case, I'd say most big companies which sell packages tend to be terrible in that respect.. usually giving the powerful 3.x GHz Pentium 4 with crappy 256MB of RAM and integrated video. But again, that totally depends on what the user wants to do of course. If you're using it for business/education purposes, it's not totally bad. But don't buy these packages if you're a gamer.
If this is what he's talking about, then it shouldn't matter too much anyhow since Dell offers customisation of the specs.. (guess I'm mainly taking a cheap shot at computers like pre-assembled HP Pavilions etc.).
codereder said:
wat i mean by in sync, is why i thought getting from dell is better. i thought dell gets hardware that works well together, eg some brand of harddrive and RAM work best together, so then if u build it urself, u might buy brands which arent best together
Not really, it's mostly to do with the hardware specs themselves rather than the brand. In that respect, like I said before Dell gives you customisation. And if you're given customisation option, why buy from Dell? Just choose them yourself and build it.. you'll end up with something less expensive.
The only reason why Dell might be a good option for you is that you sound like you don't know much about computers.. so building it yourself might seem a bit unfeasible right now. Dell desktops in my opinion atleast are certainly cheaper than pre-made packages from other brands (due to their online business paradigm) and plus you get customisation ability.