MedVision ad

Water Quality (1 Viewer)

PoLaRbEaR

The Bear
Joined
Apr 13, 2003
Messages
253
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
I was going throught the notes at http://hsc.csu.edu.au/chemistry/core/monitoring/chem945/945net.html#net4 and under the dot point "describe and assess the effectiveness of methods used to purify and sanitise mass water supplies" it says:
There are several methods used to purify mass water supplies. Most are variations on the following process:
flocculation and sedeimentation -> filtration -> sanitisation -> pH adjustment
but in the text book Macmillan Chemistry Pathways 2 its says the steps are aeration -> flocculation -> sedimentation -> filtration -> chlorination and microbiological tests -> flouridation
so wat im asking is which one is right, or are both of them right?
 

kini mini

Active Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2002
Messages
1,272
Location
Sydney
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2002
They are both right in the sense that there's more than one way to purify water supplies. But I would go with Thickett, he is more comprehensive and has pH adjustment in there too IIRC.
 

abdooooo!!!

Banned
Joined
Mar 17, 2003
Messages
1,655
Location
Australia, Auburn Gender: Male
you suppose to describe and assess the effectiveness of methods (so there must be atleast two if not a few). i did a few and described and assess the effectiveness based on cost and quality...
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top