Originally posted by Generator
If you can't afford the debt (even though you may not notice it, as Raiks has already said, although that isn't necessarily true) then don't take a degree that spans five years.
Students shouldn't look at degrees in terms of cost, because relative to the rest of the Western World (ie everywhere else) our system is very cheap. Degrees are generally priced in accordance with a) cost of instruction and b) projected income.
a) is how much the university pays to provide the facilities of education (eg labs and cadavers for med students). These costs are a LOT more than what HECS reels in, and is covered by the government from taxes.
b) is how much graduates usually make in their careers. Generally doctors, lawyers, vets and dentists will have little problem affording the HECS debt. Of course, their starting income is usually over the payment threshold and so they will feel the sting of their debt as soon as they graduate. First band graduates (arts etc) may have more difficulty
affording their debt, which is why the threshold is in place. They will not have to pay HECS until they are earning enough in their careers to live suitably and still afford the payments.
The thing most students are protesting to is the fact that HECS can keep students in debt for a significant length of their active lifetime, and that the government is charging fees that are too high, perpetuating this debt. Overall this system is excellent (in that even more financially dependent people can get to university without requiring hundred-thousand dollar loans), except for the fees demanded of students (unlike back in our teachers day when the government paid students to study at university).