• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page

Math Comp Qs (1 Viewer)

Lukybear

Active Member
Joined
May 6, 2008
Messages
1,466
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
This Question I dont get from 2008:

How many different positive numbers are equal to the product of two odd one-digit numbers?

Its supposedly to be done using algebra, so can any1 pleasese enlighten me? Working out and explanation are very beneficial.
 

study-freak

Bored of
Joined
Feb 8, 2008
Messages
1,133
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
I think it is:
No of different numbers formed by multiplication of two different one-digit odd numbers
=5C1x4C1/2 since for e.g. (1,5) and (5,1) give the same number.
=10.

No of different numbers formed by multiplication of two same one-digit odd numbers
=5C1x1
=5.

Total=15 different numbers.
 

kurt.physics

Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2007
Messages
840
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
I think it is:
No of different numbers formed by multiplication of two different one-digit odd numbers
=5C1x4C1/2 since for e.g. (1,5) and (5,1) give the same number.
=10.

No of different numbers formed by multiplication of two same one-digit odd numbers
=5C1x1
=5.

Total=15 different numbers.
Close, but it is actually 14 because 1 x 9 is the same as 3 x 3.
 

Lukybear

Active Member
Joined
May 6, 2008
Messages
1,466
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
Study-Freak: How did you get the 4 in 5x4/2??

EDIT: O Nvm
 
Last edited:

Lukybear

Active Member
Joined
May 6, 2008
Messages
1,466
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
Question:

1) What is the smallest whole number which gives a square number when multiplied by 2008?

2) A number is less than 2008. It is odd, it leaves a remainder of 2 when divided by 3 and a remainder of 4 when divided by 5. What is the sum of the digits of the largest such number.
 
K

khorne

Guest
1) I won't do it, but you could reduce 2008 to all it's prime roots, and then find which roots are not to the power of a multiple of 2 and then make them....

Not sure if this would work but...

Let me try actually:

so it's 2^3 x 251 (which is prime)
Therefore it must be multiplied by 2x251 = 502

502*2008 = 1008016 sqrt answer = 1004 So I think it's right

Did you guys know 251 is a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexy_prime
 
Last edited by a moderator:

kurt.physics

Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2007
Messages
840
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
1) I won't do it, but you could reduce 2008 to all it's prime roots, and then find which roots are not to the power of a multiple of 2 and then make them....

Not sure if this would work but...

Let me try actually:

so it's 2^3 x 251 (which is prime)
Therefore it must be multiplied by 2x251 = 502

502*2008 = 1008016 sqrt answer = 1004 So I think it's right

Did you guys know 251 is a Sexy prime - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

thats what i got.
 

kurt.physics

Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2007
Messages
840
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Question:

1) What is the smallest whole number which gives a square number when multiplied by 2008?

2) A number is less than 2008. It is odd, it leaves a remainder of 2 when divided by 3 and a remainder of 4 when divided by 5. What is the sum of the digits of the largest such number.

2)Let this number be m

m = 3n + 2
m = 5p + 4

m + 1 = 3(n + 1) (1)
m + 1 = 5(p + 1) (2)

Also, m is odd, and so when we add 1, it will be even, and so is divisible by 2.

So m+1 is a multiple of 3 from (1) and a multiple of 5 from (2) and also a multiple of 2. So m + 1 is also a multiple of 30.

So we can look for the largest multiple of 30 thats under 2008. This number is 1980. So

m+1 = 1980

.: m = 1979

Thus the sum is 1 + 9 + 7 + 9 = 26
 

kurt.physics

Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2007
Messages
840
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
If you know modular arithmatic, then the solution is simple and elegant.

Letting this number be m,



also,



and as m is odd,





The largest number -1 mod 30 is 1979

Thus the sum and hence answer is:

 
Last edited:

thetai903

Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2008
Messages
46
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Hum...
I would not be suprise to see kurt.physics come 1st in the state for something. What school are you from, kurt?
 

youngminii

Banned
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
2,083
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
I'm guessing you're going to be the first time your school gets a student that comes first in the state for Maths.
Damn you're like Namu x2.
 

Lukybear

Active Member
Joined
May 6, 2008
Messages
1,466
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
1) I won't do it, but you could reduce 2008 to all it's prime roots, and then find which roots are not to the power of a multiple of 2 and then make them....

Not sure if this would work but...

Let me try actually:

so it's 2^3 x 251 (which is prime)
Therefore it must be multiplied by 2x251 = 502

502*2008 = 1008016 sqrt answer = 1004 So I think it's right
Is there a speicific rule for this? And where did you learn such things?
 

kurt.physics

Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2007
Messages
840
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Is there a speicific rule for this? And where did you learn such things?
There are a couple of "rules". Firstly what khorne did was prime factorise the number, prime factorization is where you make a number completely out of primes, because every number can be expressed as the product of primes. To do so, you divide a number by a small prime and then continue this process until you end up at a prime number.

For example, take 72. The last digit is a multiple of 2, so we can easily tell that 2 is a factor. Dividing by 2 we get 36. So 72 = 2 x 36. But 36 is not a prime, so we observe that 36 is also divisible by 2. Dividing by 2 we get 18. So 36 = 2 x 18, and so 72 = 2 x (2 x 18) = 2 x 2 x 18. Continuing in this way we find 72 = 2 x 2 x 2 x 3 x 3

This can be written as 72 = 23 x 32.

Why do we prime factorize? We do this because it reveals alot of information about that number.

Another rule is to understand that for a number to be a perfect square, the prime factorization MUST have each numbers exponent as a multiple of 2. For example, lets look at the number 72 again, recall its prime factorization is 23 x 32

Take the square root of 72



remember:



so,





Now,

can easily be found, it is 3, because:



but cannot be easily found, because as you know, it equals . So the square root of 72 is . But this number is not an integer, and so 72 is not a perfect square (as the root of a square must be an integer).

But if it were then the square root would be

So just note that a perfect squares prime factorization will have all its exponents (powers) as a multiple of 2.

The prime factorization of 2008 is 23 x 251.

So to make this a perfect square, we must multiply the 23 by 2 to get the power to be 4 (which is a multiple of 2), and to get 251 to be a multiple of 2 we must multiple 251 by 251 to get 2512.

The new number is 24 x 2512, and so as all its powers are a multiple of 2, then the number is a perfect square.

But the numbers we have to multiple 2008 by to get this perfect square by was 2 x 251, which is 502. This is indeed the answer.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top