low band 5 (1 Viewer)

[untouchablecuz]

what do you guys reckon 75/105?

 

[Catheriinee]

nah maybe high band 2

 

[absorber]

what do you guys reckon 75/105?

I'd pay about 80

 

[Aerath]

what do you guys reckon 75/105?

Definitely higher than low band 5. Could be anywhere from mid band 5 - low band 6

 

[absorber]

Definitely higher than low band 5. Could be anywhere from mid band 5 - low band 6

Lol, I think a low band 6 is pushing it just a *little*.

 

[MrEconomics]

I'm hoping for a band5.. if not I will be happy with a band4

I guess around 75-78 raw mark

 

[q3thefish]

C'mooon high band 4 low band 5 ahah. Input guys! I need confidence!

 

[Snoople]

mid band 5btw does anyone know how bad you have to go to get 70?

 

[kaz1]

69/105

 

[Aerath]

Lol, I think a low band 6 is pushing it just a *little*.

Not necessarily. If they decide to be harsh... Wouldn't be the first time BoS have tried to screw us over.

 

[absorber]

Not necessarily. If they decide to be harsh... Wouldn't be the first time BoS have tried to screw us over.

75/105? In previous years we've seen it's been around 85. That'd be some massive screwing around; I do wonder if by 'screw us over' you meant 'write a question we couldn't be bothered to read properly' though.

 

[lychnobity]

mid band 5btw does anyone know how bad you have to go to get 70?

I'm basing this off the results of 2007, but about 62/105

 

[jessmooka]

ok, as dumb as this sounds, i still dont get the concept of scaling marks to fit bands? can someone explain in easy language, I've been told so many things it's confusifying my brain... Aereath?

 

[thommy]

In my HSC last year I got a mid band 5 (84), and thought that I would have got similar to the trials, which was 85, I think. So if that's any indication, you'd probabaly need more than 75. Unless I went worse than I think I did, who knows?

 

[madsam]

Well according to the SAM calculator, a mark of 65% scales to 80 apparently, and that's low band 5

 

[untouchablecuz]

i hope to God SAM is right