MedVision ad

question 1d.. final answer (1 Viewer)

cd285

Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2007
Messages
65
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2009
the lns got me confused in the end.
what was the final answer?

it was x-6/ x^2+3x-4
 

lolokay

Active Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Messages
1,015
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2009
I screwed this question up. I originally read the -4 as a +4, so was starting a different method, but then realised it was a -4. so I had a combination of two different methods, which ended up being quite messy, and I don't think I ended up with the right answer :(
 

kwokie

Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2007
Messages
60
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
I did some insanely stupid method, i tried to make the top derivative of the bottom, then use reverse chain rule, then i proceeded to use partial fractions for the remainder and miraculously still ended up wtih same answer after about 1.5 pages. Would i still get full marks for that? I hope the marker understands what i did coz im quite messy.
 

sillyboy

New Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2009
Messages
19
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
lol it was easily done with quick inspection of partial fractions
 

kwokie

Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2007
Messages
60
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
I realised that after i completed all that, for some stupid reason I looked at it once and thought it is not factorisable and thought its one of those with tan inverse and log one, but really fml wasted so much time there. I spent like 20+ mins on q1 and didnt get to start q8
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top