• Want to help us with this year's BoS Trials?
    Let us know before 30 June. See this thread for details
  • Looking for HSC notes and resources?
    Check out our Notes & Resources page

Criminal Krudd to hand over our wealth (1 Viewer)

loquasagacious

NCAP Mooderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2004
Messages
3,636
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2004
I'm sorry if I hurt your feelings.
I was indeed deeply hurt by your cutting observation....

The "squabbling" is in order to achieve something, don't you get that? You have to play the political game to get things done, to do some good.
Tip: read my 12:13AM post where I tacitly approved of democratic process.

That's democracy for you, the best there is. Would you rather a dictator who didn't muck around with people's rights or opinions, just got things done? They might not be good things but man they're efficient.
That's a straw man argument. Though I do broadly agree that the combination of people voting and the balance of enshrined protection of liberties is the best system there is. Within that umbrella though there are many permutations which are not ideal - the Australian system being just one of them.

Or would you put your entire existence at the mercy of "market forces" and the world of capitalism, without any regulation? With unpredictable results, subject to the desires of the business world, whose main motivation is to make money. It's not to help anyone, it's not to do what's right for a country, it's to make money.
Another straw man. And a clear misunderstanding of what markets actually do and how they actually operate.

Just because your perception of "good" differs from those of today's elected representatives, doesn't mean it's evil.
I don't believe I referred to them as evil or myself as good. Generally speaking I think that most people are good in that they are doing things which they genuinely believe are 'good things' which achieve good outcomes. However I also think that many of these people are misguided and incorrect in their perception of what a 'good thing' is. In other words they are well-meaning but mistaken. In contrast I believe that I am well-meaning and correct in my conclusions.
 

redmayne

Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2009
Messages
212
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
The "you" was plural, directed at those more anti-government than you. More anti-reason than you.

Enter jennyfromdabloc.
 

jennyfromdabloc

coked up sociopath
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
735
Location
The American Gardens Building
Gender
Female
HSC
2007
PM's pay: $330,000 pa

Sol Trujillo's pay: $11,000,000 pa (before $20,000,000 payout)

John Thain (Merrill Lynch CEO) pay: US$83,100,000
Rudd's wife is a multimillionaire from government contracts.

Most politicians also get lucrative private sector gigs (as a reward from their rent seeking pals) once they retire.

Money is not the only thing that corrupts people. Politicians may also be motivated by a lust for power.

Quoting pay figures at me does nothing to prove that politicians have purer motives for their actions.

Also, what is wrong with being motivated by money? Without the government, the only way to make a profit is by giving consumers what they want, this sounds like a good thing.

A desire for money is not equivalent to greed either. Look at the billions being donated by Bill Gates and Warren Buffet to charity. The two richest people on earth are actually giving away most of their fortunes.
 

will-anal

Banned
Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Messages
157
Gender
Male
HSC
1998
I'm almost Libertarian except I believe there should be a basic level of government funded healthcare and education which is not sub par like it is atm.

Given that I think tax is shit, I'm not sure how they'd fund this, when I think healthcare I think 100% free meds like England, but I'm p sure the tax rate in England is fucking nuts.

I might investigate France for a moment, brb
 

jennyfromdabloc

coked up sociopath
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
735
Location
The American Gardens Building
Gender
Female
HSC
2007
I'm almost Libertarian except I believe there should be a basic level of government funded healthcare and education which is not sub par like it is atm.

Given that I think tax is shit, I'm not sure how they'd fund this, when I think healthcare I think 100% free meds like England, but I'm p sure the tax rate in England is fucking nuts.

I might investigate France for a moment, brb
This used to be me.

Then I realised that government interference is what drives up the cost of education and healthcare by a huge factor, and that even poor people would be able to afford decent healthcare (as in at least as good as they get now) without government intervention.

Look how bad it is for the poor now. Do you really think the poor student forced to go to their local public schools in poor areas are getting a decent education?
 
Last edited:

will-anal

Banned
Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Messages
157
Gender
Male
HSC
1998
This used to be me.

Then I realised that government interference is what drives up the cost of education and healthcare by a huge factor, and that even poor people would be able to afford decent healthcare (as in at least as good as they get now) without government intervention.
Well yes, I guess so.

I've paid nearly 3k in tax this year already, if I didn't have to pay that tax I'd be able add that to my income and would not need subsidized health or education. Given I have private health insurance and that Nick will probably go to a private school, it's like I'm paying twice which is heaps gay imo tbh
 

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
This used to be me.

Then I realised that government interference is what drives up the cost of education and healthcare by a huge factor, and that even poor people would be able to afford decent healthcare (as in at least as good as they get now) without government intervention.

Look how bad it is for the poor now. Do you really think the poor student forced to go to their local public schools in poor areas are getting a decent education?
I object to your use of the term "realised". I implies now you actually know something.
 

lala2

Banned
Joined
Aug 23, 2004
Messages
2,790
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
I'm pretty undecided on this issue. I think it's a noble attempt by Rudd & Turnbull to do something about the environment (or maybe just boost their popularity), but I don't think it's the right way to go about it. I don't know what the right way (or a better way) is, but this isn't it. Though I think both leaders should be focusing on other more important things right now anyway.
 

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
It's a basic fact, you subsidize something, you drive up the price.
It's a theory. Your free market mumbo jumbo is all theoretical as evidenced by your own admissions that no free market utopia has ever been realized especially not in the modern world where capital can cross national borders so quickly and easily.
 

will-anal

Banned
Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Messages
157
Gender
Male
HSC
1998
Serious question though
Monaco has no income tax. How's that working out for them? (I really have no idea but I believe Monaco has one of the highest living standards in the world??). I think the state still retains a monopoly on a lot of services?

France is a pretty good example though eh?
France's economy combines extensive private enterprise (nearly 2.5 million companies registered)[38][39] with substantial (though declining[40]) government intervention
, except they still tax heavily on incomes
 

jennyfromdabloc

coked up sociopath
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
735
Location
The American Gardens Building
Gender
Female
HSC
2007
It's a theory. Your free market mumbo jumbo is all theoretical as evidenced by your own admissions that no free market utopia has ever been realized especially not in the modern world where capital can cross national borders so quickly and easily.
We don't need a "free market utopia" to exist to observe that subsidies drive up prices.
 
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
352
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
if the economic transaction has a benificial spillover, then a subsidy is warranted
 

0bs3n3

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
666
Location
Newcastle, NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
Opposition should oppose it outright, at least that way they won't be tainted come next election. Lack of effective conservatives ftl. Barnaby Joyce is the only one I trust.
 

SylviaB

Just Bee Yourself 🐝
Joined
Nov 26, 2008
Messages
6,925
Location
Lidcombe
Gender
Female
HSC
2021
Yeah, not really worth fighting for then?

so you think that an effective way of fighting for freedom is to essentially allow the government to take away practically all it?

like I've already said, it's not that I don't believe in freedom enough to do it, it's just that it's a very poor way of fighting for it

like tax evasion for example, if a whole bunch of libertarians all hide income and get caught, then they'll if anything they'll just remove more freedoms and make things even stricter, achieving the opposite of what you were hoping to
 

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
so you think that an effective way of fighting for freedom is to essentially allow the government to take away practically all it?

like I've already said, it's not that I don't believe in freedom enough to do it, it's just that it's a very poor way of fighting for it

like tax evasion for example, if a whole bunch of libertarians all hide income and get caught, then they'll if anything they'll just remove more freedoms and make things even stricter, achieving the opposite of what you were hoping to
Well the Charlie Perkins strategy of defying the rules seemed to achieve more than yours. Just saying. Not really worth fighting for
 

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
fuck you're retarded
I keep thinking of that quote from the nutter that you people always seem to worship. Franklin I think, something like those who would give up essentially liberty to buy a little temporary protection deserve neither?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top