Malcolm Turnbull quits politics. Tears. (1 Viewer)

yoddle

is cool
Joined
Nov 29, 2008
Messages
1,129
Location
nowhere man
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Malcolm Turnbull's small 'l' liberalism leaves big legacy
(0 comments)

GREG BARNS

Make no mistake: Malcolm Turnbull's decision to quit politics represents a significant loss not only to the Liberal Party but to the Australian Parliament. This is because Turnbull is arguably most intellectually gifted MP in Canberra today and because he represented a brand of political values that is not found in either of the major political forces in this country today - liberalism with a small 'l'.

Having said that, Mr Turnbull is not one to hang around. It was always hard to imagine that Malcolm Turnbull, a monstrously hard worker and potent lateral thinker on policy matters, would be content to serve time in a Liberal Party that is led by Tony Abbott - a man who is a hard core conservative.

If nothing else, Abbott's negative political style would have grated with someone like Turnbull who, like that other policy focused New South Wales political figure former Premier Nick Greiner, was prepared to reach across the ideological divide to tackle the big issues facing Australia and the world.

When Turnbull went into federal politics in 2004, and when he became Leader of the Liberal Party in 2008 I wrote that he would take his party on a roller coaster ride. And he did not disappoint.

Who will forget Turnbull standing up and staring down the conservatives in the Liberal Party late last year who wanted no part of ensuring that their party was engaged on one of the most important moral, environmental and business issues of our time - climate change.

It was a thrills and spills event that dragged on for over a week with Turnbull holding media conferences declaring he had the support of his party room, while one after another of the conservatives led by South Australian Senator Nick Minchin and his Tasmanian sidekick Eric Abetz resigned their front bench posts and forced Turnbull from the leadership by only one vote.

Turnbull's approach to politics was, to borrow Gough Whitlam's immortal phrase, 'crash through or crash'. And it nearly succeeded. The climate change issue was emblematic of the shift in direction the Liberal Party was embarked upon under Turnbull.

After more than a decade of stultifying conservatism under John Howard, Turnbull represented a more socially and economically rational and liberal approach to policy.

Take for example his defence of artist Bill Henson in 2008. Whereas Turnbull's predecessor Brendan Nelson was quick to jump on the bandwagon of moral conservatives in condemning Henson for his artistic portrayal of teenage girls, Turnbull did not join that populist chorus which included the Prime Minister Kevin Rudd.

Instead Turnbull rightly saw the issue as one of freedom of thought and speech.

And when Turnbull was Environment Minister in Mr Howard's government he had no truck with the conservative mantra about states' rights. He told the media in 2007 that if Victoria was not prepared to sign up to a plan to save the environmentally degraded Murray-Darling Basin then "the Commonwealth would have two choices. We either abandon the most important water reform in our nation's history, completely, simply because of one state, or we proceed under the Commonwealth's powers".

Turnbull represented a more difficult target for the ALP and Rudd. His liberalism made him attractive to some Labor voters who were none too enamoured of their own Party's conservatism. For this reason alone one wonders why the federal Liberal Party dumped Turnbull for a wildcard conservative in Abbott?

So what is next for Mr. Turnbull?

One hopes his energy and intellect is not lost to public discourse for ever because his contribution thus far has been a positive for this nation.

Greg Barns is a lawyer and advocates for prisoners in Tasmania.
ABC The Drum Unleashed - Malcolm Turnbull's small 'l' liberalism leaves big legacy
I am very sad. But Malcolm is probably too impatient and too active to hang around until after the next election, where he could of claimed the leadership and and take the Liberal Party into territory it could be proud of. With Minchin and possibly Abbott gone, his task would have been easier.

Who is there left to bring the Liberal party back to it's core philosophies of individual rights as opposed to moral conservatism? Christopher Pyne? EWW. Greg Hunt? Bigger eww.
 

DM Mike

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2009
Messages
34
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Turnbull is a great loss to politics, no matter what side of the chamber you fall on, had he been given the opportunity he would have been considered one of the true statesman of australian politics.

I got to admit that I think the libs have been grooming Andrew Robb as an alternative to turnbull...
 

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
I am very sad. But Malcolm is probably too impatient and too active to hang around until after the next election, where he could of claimed the leadership and and take the Liberal Party into territory it could be proud of. With Minchin and possibly Abbott gone, his task would have been easier.

Who is there left to bring the Liberal party back to it's core philosophies of individual rights as opposed to moral conservatism? Christopher Pyne? EWW. Greg Hunt? Bigger eww.
I think its been quite clear for quite some time that the second ranking member of the wet liberals is Joe Hockey and indeed the heir apparent to the liberal leadership once Abbott is given his run at a general election.

A far more interesting question I think is who will become the alternative leader? Petter Dutton and Chris Pyne have been spoken of here and there as the future of the party blah blah blah, they weren't be in the parliament in 2011(maybe one of them should contest Wentworth). Downer, Costello, Nelson, Turnbull and Abbott are all finished, unless they go for some "new generation" bullshit and try and put Steve Ciobo or Tony Smith in I think it can only seriously fall to one man.
 

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Turnbull is a great loss to politics, no matter what side of the chamber you fall on, had he been given the opportunity he would have been considered one of the true statesman of australian politics.

I got to admit that I think the libs have been grooming Andrew Robb as an alternative to turnbull...
No they haven't. You couldn't find half a dozen liberal mp's who think that the man to lead the liberals in 2013 will be a sixty one year old, boring old crank whose defection on the ETS effectively brought undone the Turnbull leadership. In the power vacuum of late 2009 Robb was thought of as a possible plug in some parts but he will be four years older come the 2013 election, he's done his dash.
 

JohnMcGee

Banned
Joined
Mar 1, 2010
Messages
408
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Turnbull is a great loss to politics, no matter what side of the chamber you fall on, had he been given the opportunity he would have been considered one of the true statesman of australian politics.
I agree with this. Turnbull's intelligence and charisma would have been good had it been given the chance. Sad day.
 

Lauchlan

Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2010
Messages
671
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
Malcolm didn't look like he stood a chance in the polls let alone the election.
Tony stands a better chance, hopefully not too much of a chance that he wins.
 

yoddle

is cool
Joined
Nov 29, 2008
Messages
1,129
Location
nowhere man
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
^ say to the what?

Pretty sure no one even thinks twice about Hockey's race at all.

I think to 96% of voters he's just Australian. Fat, but Australian.

I think he lacks charisma and gravitas when it comes to being an alternative PM though. Agree with Lentern in regard to Andrew Robb, certainly not leadership material. Christopher Pyne is a smarmy and sickening.
 

Graney

Horse liberty
Joined
Jul 17, 2007
Messages
4,434
Location
Bereie
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
I think wilson tuckey would make a great prime minister.

Seriously.
 

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
The only reason abbot has more of a chance is that the Turnbulls ideals didn't mesh well with the right wing/conservative/ultra conservative types that are more willing to vote in Abbot. I even remember one conservative individual mention his Jewish links and how that would impact his chances.

I think Hockey is the next Turnbullite left in the Libs, less articulate but similiar ideals. But i dare say his in for a fight, not just on policy, but also because of his race. That should note matter one iota, but in Australia it will. Having said that after the next election, people will be sick of Rudd. people are already sick of him but atm he is the lesser of two evils. Malcolm was an angel when compared to the likes of rudd/abbot.
Ben I would put it to you that the biggest reason Abbott is doing better than Turnbull is that he became leader of the liberal party ten months out from an election instead of 24. As for Abbott's views being more "acceptable" to the liberal party flank, I think there are as many moderate liberals nauseated by Abbott as there were dry liberals who couldn't stand Turnbull. Because Abbott became leader so close to the election they'll hold their noses for 2010 but if it looks for a moment like he plans to soldier on in 2011 they will come out all guns a blazing.

On the issue of Joe's race, I doubt it will be a problem because he's a liberal. There might be some cynical misstrust of a Palestinian lefty from western Sydney in the ALP but a North Shore lawyer in the liberal party should be alright. Obviously it's a bigger task for an arab to reach the leadership of the liberal party then the ALP but given his abilities and the departure of almost every Howard cabinet minister means he won't have much trouble getting there.
 

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Yeah i certainly hope Hockey will be selected by libs, I'd certainly vote for him if KRudd was still PM. That seems like a certainty, but you never know. Yes I agree it probably won't matter a lot that he is Arabic for the majority of voters, but in an election, where a small minority can decide an election, I'd be concerned that the Hansonites/Abbot-Howard conservative will not garner enough votes for the libs. But i guess also the beauty of compulsory voting is that some in that minority will probably end up having vote for the Libs because they don't have much choice.

Agree with you on a number of points, I don't think Abbot will survive after this years election, although he will probably be quite content sticking it out if given the chance.

But who do you think is a serious alternative to Hockey? Chris Pyne and his display as manager of oppisition business will detract from his other good qualities. I'm thinking Greg Hunt.
Pyne won't be around anyway so scratch him out. Sturt is very marginal and Abbott is not enroute to reduce the majority. I'm sure he'll be back but in terms of the next parliament, Pyne won't be a member of it.

If you mean who is the alternative leader of the liberal party to Hockey then I think its quite safely Bishop. I know a lot of people, myself included, don't find that a very inspiring concept but its not an impossible one, not in a country that saw Latham and Abbott rise to the top.

If you mean who aside from Hockey is a small l liberal that could rise to the leadership in the next three years, good question. The next most prominent small l liberal is Senator Brandis and he obviously won't lead the party. I don't consider Andrew Robb a small l liberal even if I thought he was a serious leadership contender. He along with Julie Bishop, Peter Costello etc tends to fall around the middle of the party room which was dragged to the right a fair bit by the success of a right wing leader for 12 years.

If You demand names Hunt and Pyne are obviously the most prominent of the trendy, urban, progressive new liberal types after Hockey but Hunt I don't think the number of people in the party who hold Hunt in high regard is quite low. I think they view him as a bit flimsy, punching above his weight, lacking in stature. He really got the portfolio because Nelson and Turnbull were trying to cast the liberals as this swanky, glossy, new party full of bright young things. Sharman Stone is probably the most likely small l liberal after Hockey. She's a more serious figure and has more gravitas than the new kids on the block. That's not a suggestion that she is in the leadership mix mind you, I think the small l's would be likely to turn to someone in the parties middle who they thought had a better chance before turning to Stone.
 

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
And if something would happen to Krudd who would be the likely successor if Labour were to loose the election after this years? I have a feeling its not going to be Gillard. Even though she is very well equipped to lead this nation, I don't quite think Labour would select her.
Smith is the most likely bet. In the case Gillard somehow managed to win over all the Ferguson Left and Socialist left factions and a few splitters from Labor Unity I think the right wing powerbrokers might throw themselves behind Tanner and split Gillard's own base. But honestly I think Smith has most of Beazleys old numbers annd unlike Rudd Gillard won't be able to split many of them.
 

yoddle

is cool
Joined
Nov 29, 2008
Messages
1,129
Location
nowhere man
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Stephen Smith? Despite your self-assured argumentative style you sometimes really don't know what you're talking about.
 

spakfilla

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2010
Messages
44
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
Who gives a shit! Turnbull was more labor then Kevin Rudd, just a bloody trouble maker. We shall see Abbot win the election this year.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top