• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page

Stationary point Question 5 b) CSSA 2009 paper (1 Viewer)

MrBrightside

Brightest Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2010
Messages
2,032
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Hi, there

I seem to be having troubles with the factorising part after I make y' = 0.

The original question is:

Consider the curve given by y = 2x^3 - 9x^2 +12x

Find the stat points and their nature.


y' = 6x^2 - 18x +12

6x^2 - 18x +12 = 0

I divided all bases by 6

x^2 - 3x +2 = 0

when I factorise I get

(x + 3)(x - 1) = 0

x = -3 or x = 1


HOWEVER the answers do not divide their bases by 6

they just do 6(x - 2)(x - 1) = 0

x = 1 or x = 2


I'm am confused as to why I don't get the same answer, I used this method on other questions a long time ago and got them right. I don't know why its not working here.

I need an explanation as to why the 6 is left outside the brackets etc, rather than dividing everything by 6.

Thank you
 

SpiralFlex

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
6,960
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A


For stationary points,









When

When






Nature:

At



Hence is a minimum turning point.


At



Hence is a maximum turning point.

You also had some algebra errors. They did not divide by 6 probably because you will need it to take the second derivative. It should not really matter in my opinion.
 
Last edited:

AAEldar

Premium Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
2,246
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
You factorised wrong.

does NOT factorise to but rather it factorises to and hence that is where their answers come from.

Dividing by the common factor won't give a wrong answer.
 

MrBrightside

Brightest Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2010
Messages
2,032
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
You factorised wrong.

does NOT factorise to but rather it factorises to and hence that is where their answers come from.

Dividing by the common factor won't give a wrong answer.
but... but.. Isn't it the 3*-1 meant to = the -3x in the middle and 3 + - 1 give 2? SHIT, It's the other way 0.0 omg :( I need to practice.
 

MrBrightside

Brightest Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2010
Messages
2,032
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A


For stationary points,









When

When






Nature:

At



Hence is a minimum turning point.


At



Hence is a maximum turning point.

You also had some algebra errors. They did not divide by 6 probably because you will need it to take the second derivative. It should not really matter in my opinion.
you know how you found the 2nd derivative, Do you think it is easier doing the table method using the 1st derivative to see the slopes of the gradients?
 

SpiralFlex

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
6,960
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
you know how you found the 2nd derivative, Do you think it is easier doing the table method using the 1st derivative to see the slopes of the gradients?
Not for these types of questions. It would be convenient to find the second derivative. If you really want to test close values on the RHS and LHS, go for it.
 

MrBrightside

Brightest Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2010
Messages
2,032
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Not for these types of questions. It would be convenient to find the second derivative. If you really want to test close values on the RHS and LHS, go for it.
Nah, I see what you mean. Its quicker to do 2nd derivative for qs with easier equations. The table method is best used for log and trig qs, where decimals gets in the way of coordinates etc.
 

SpiralFlex

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
6,960
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
Nah, I see what you mean. Its quicker to do 2nd derivative for qs with easier equations. The table method is best used for log and trig qs, where decimals gets in the way of coordinates etc.
It would be wise to also not to find the second derivative or square roots, those tricky ones. Silly mistakes can often result.
 

MrBrightside

Brightest Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2010
Messages
2,032
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
It would be wise to also not to find the second derivative or square roots, those tricky ones. Silly mistakes can often result.
yeah that too.

Also when can you use the term d/dx? like to = a formula to be derived, I see it sometimes, is it when there's no y mentioned?
 

SpiralFlex

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
6,960
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
is just an operator. It operates on some function of . Just take it as "simply differentiate."
 

MrBrightside

Brightest Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2010
Messages
2,032
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
is just an operator. It operates on some function of . Just take it as "simply differentiate."
yeah I know it means differentiate, but, i'm not sure if i'm making a mistake not using it, for example instead of saying y' could i just use d/dx, whats different between dy/dx to d/dx ? i prefer y' and y" or f'(x) and f"(x), more simpler to use, the d/dx thing throughs me off using dy/dx and d^2y/dx^2
 

enoilgam

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 11, 2011
Messages
11,897
Location
Mare Crisium
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2010
you know how you found the 2nd derivative, Do you think it is easier doing the table method using the 1st derivative to see the slopes of the gradients?
I did all questions in the first derivative, doing it in the second took longer for me and it increased the potential for stupid errors.
 

SpiralFlex

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
6,960
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
yeah I know it means differentiate, but, i'm not sure if i'm making a mistake not using it, for example instead of saying y' could i just use d/dx, whats different between dy/dx to d/dx ? i prefer y' and y" or f'(x) and f"(x), more simpler to use, the d/dx thing throughs me off using dy/dx and d^2y/dx^2
When you use the operator to a specific function it will result in the function of , the first derivative of .



 

MrBrightside

Brightest Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2010
Messages
2,032
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
When you use the operator to a specific function it will result in the function of , the first derivative of .



Ohhhh so d/dx is just another form of notation to say y. I get it now Thanks.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
4,741
Location
sarajevo
Gender
Female
HSC
2015
Uni Grad
2017
Ohhhh so d/dx is just another form of notation to say y. I get it now Thanks.
umm not quite

is an operator, kinda like plus/minus/times/divide, think of it as a verb

is a relation, a relationship between the slope of a function and its x-coordinate, think of it as a noun
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top