who gives a fuck about 9/11 (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
3,272
Location
The Pub
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
all im sayin is, that the usa have committed a fair few war crimes and kind of deserved it
 

funkshen

dvds didnt exist in 1991
Joined
Nov 5, 2006
Messages
2,137
Location
butt
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
how would you like it if a cessna 172 crashed in to dubbo council chambers
 
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
3,272
Location
The Pub
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
i would be nonchalant

it would result in some interesting photos etc

i dont think any of the dubbo councillors are war criminals though
 

Lolsmith

kill all boomers
Joined
Dec 4, 2009
Messages
4,570
Location
Forever UNSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
nah bullshit cunt

No one *deserves* 9/11 because the victims are almost exclusively civilians that have nothing to do with the military

The reaction to it was pretty ridiculous
 
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
3,272
Location
The Pub
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
nah they had it coming

the usas little habit of forcefully removing democratically elected governments and installing compliant dictator ships came back and bit them on the arse
it wasnt some secret, everyone knows it happened.


that said, i dont sympathise with the arabs at all either, they are just as complicit
dumb sand monkeys following a retarded religion
 
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
3,272
Location
The Pub
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
obviously a lot of people innocent people died rip etc but i dont care about them any more than i care about the couple hundred thousand iraqis killed in the past 8 yrs

and i was referring the usa as a whole anyway. they brought this upon themselves




osama won the war btw
perfectly executed battleplan
 

Lolsmith

kill all boomers
Joined
Dec 4, 2009
Messages
4,570
Location
Forever UNSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
Sure they had it coming but that doesn't mean that nearly 3000 civilians deserved to die come on m8 really
 
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
3,272
Location
The Pub
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
"A number of analysts have observed that although bin Laden was finally killed, he won some major successes in his war against the US. "He repeatedly asserted that the only way to drive the US from the Muslim world and defeat its satraps was by drawing Americans into a series of small but expensive wars that would ultimately bankrupt them," Eric Margolis writes. "'Bleeding the US,' in his words. The United States, first under George W Bush and then Barack Obama, rushed right into bin Laden’s trap ... Grotesquely overblown military outlays and debt addiction ... may be the most pernicious legacy of the man who thought he could defeat the United States” - particularly when the debt is being cynically exploited by the far right, with the collusion of the Democrat establishment, to undermine what remains of social programs, public education, unions, and, in general, remaining barriers to corporate tyranny."

islam 1 - usa 0
 
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
3,272
Location
The Pub
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Sure they had it coming but that doesn't mean that nearly 3000 civilians deserved to die come on m8 really
im not saying people ever deserve to die but the attacks were deserved
clearly it would have been better to just destroy government infrastructure hey but im being a realist here
 
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
3,272
Location
The Pub
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
i must stress that i dont support 'terrorism' at all

but the usa fucked up once again with assassinating osama too, that was kind of very illegal and makes a mockery of the whole international judicial system
 
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
3,272
Location
The Pub
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
all im saying is that attacking the arab world (iraq/afghanistan) in retaliation make any attacks against the usa legitimate and that clearly state security was not the issue at hand and never has been, despite references to the contrary

george bush = hitler
 
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
3,272
Location
The Pub
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
ok i am bored of trolling but seriously any us/australian/british citizens need to reflect a little on postww2 history and come to terms with the fact that these attacks are probably warranted


imagine if

some iranian commandos stormed parliament house
and captured the pm (yay)
and installed shah habbibi in a theocratic dictatorship which they then supported materially for like the next 30yrs
lol
 

LightXT

Member
Joined
May 30, 2011
Messages
729
Location
Eastern Suburbs
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
Uni Grad
2015
ok i am bored of trolling but seriously any us/australian/british citizens need to reflect a little on postww2 history and come to terms with the fact that these attacks are probably warranted


imagine if

some iranian commandos stormed parliament house
and captured the pm (yay)
and installed shah habbibi in a theocratic dictatorship which they then supported materially for like the next 30yrs
lol
You're stating valid facts, so I guess your argument is valid.
 

Lolsmith

kill all boomers
Joined
Dec 4, 2009
Messages
4,570
Location
Forever UNSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
Didn't Iran have like 0 to do with this

And what the fuck do you care about international judiciary anyway, that whole thing is a load of shit

Was the operation to >capture< him illegal? Or is it only illegal that they had to defend themselves thereafter?
 
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
3,272
Location
The Pub
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Didn't Iran have like 0 to do with this

And what the fuck do you care about international judiciary anyway, that whole thing is a load of shit

Was the operation to >capture< him illegal? Or is it only illegal that they had to defend themselves thereafter?
i was referring to the cia leading a coup to remove the democratically elected leader of iran in 1953 and installing an authoritarian dictator
which led to the iranian revoluton and installation of a theocratic cesspool which hates the west

so Nuremberg was a load of shit oh

yes the operation to capture him was illegal and they made no attempt to capture him alive and put him on trial
only problem with that was that there is no evidence that he actually planned the attacks, other this his boasting and the confessions of guantanamo detainees (after torture)
they didnt have to defend themselves, he was unarmed and his wife was shot for lunging at a navy seal
 

Lolsmith

kill all boomers
Joined
Dec 4, 2009
Messages
4,570
Location
Forever UNSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
yes the operation to capture him was illegal and they made no attempt to capture him alive and put him on trial
only problem with that was that there is no evidence that he actually planned the attacks, other this his boasting and the confessions of guantanamo detainees (after torture)
they didnt have to defend themselves, he was unarmed and his wife was shot for lunging at a navy seal
How was it illegal and what does that even matter, for real. The only reason that would even come close to mattering is if someone wanted to have a whinge about it and then they're obviously terrorists themselves don't you think. I read that Osama (first typed Obama lol) was armed, but they may have revised that I didn't follow it particularly close.

Mate there would never be enough evidence under any civilised court of law to prosecute nearly 99% of suspected terrorists, but surely you can't argue that we should just let them roam free and help plot more terror instead of doing something. Mind you, Gitmo is sure as *fuck* not the answer, but there has to be something

so Nuremberg was a load of shit oh
Of course Nuremburg was a load of shit, have you heard about Goering's testimony? Basically gets up and says "nah you guys are fucking kidding me, you can't put us on trial for war crimes when you've got Soviet Russia sitting right there".
 

funkshen

dvds didnt exist in 1991
Joined
Nov 5, 2006
Messages
2,137
Location
butt
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
can we get an enhance on the girl in the middle

lolsmith international law is not a load of shit. although nuremberg was fucked up, ex post facto law always is.
 
Last edited:

Lolsmith

kill all boomers
Joined
Dec 4, 2009
Messages
4,570
Location
Forever UNSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
What I mean by that is that it is easily ignored by larger powers to no punishment so what's the fucking point if it doesn't apply to higher powers
 
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
3,272
Location
The Pub
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
How was it illegal and what does that even matter, for real. The only reason that would even come close to mattering is if someone wanted to have a whinge about it and then they're obviously terrorists themselves don't you think. I read that Osama (first typed Obama lol) was armed, but they may have revised that I didn't follow it particularly close.

Mate there would never be enough evidence under any civilised court of law to prosecute nearly 99% of suspected terrorists, but surely you can't argue that we should just let them roam free and help plot more terror instead of doing something. Mind you, Gitmo is sure as *fuck* not the answer, but there has to be something


Of course Nuremburg was a load of shit, have you heard about Goering's testimony? Basically gets up and says "nah you guys are fucking kidding me, you can't put us on trial for war crimes when you've got Soviet Russia sitting right there".
lol m8
there is usually plenty of evidence
lots of terrorists have been tried and found guilty

he was unarmed

terror attacks have increase a *lot* since afghanistan and iraq

the usa did this to themselves, you can invade a sovereign nation and not expect retaliatory attacks
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top