Juliar betrays australia, destroys our economic future (1 Viewer)

na110793

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
377
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
I'd be more concerned about all the socialist fucks taking away our properties tbh
Oh God, they might....give our properties to the housos?! And tell us to buy a new house?!? FUCK I'VE LOST HOPE IN HUMANITY.
 

boris

Banned
Joined
May 6, 2004
Messages
4,671
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Mate, this situation has mitigating factors that I failed to mention. TOTAL ANARCHY AND CHAOS. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT SOME UNPRECEDENTED SHIT BR8. LIKE HOW THE ABORIGINES LEARNED THAT PETROL IS FOR CARS, NOT SNIFFIN'.
mate do you even know any aboriginals

also 1% of the population rising up against the rest ok i think we have far more to fear from the vietnamese
 

na110793

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
377
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
mate do you even know any aboriginals

also 1% of the population rising up against the rest ok i think we have far more to fear from the vietnamese
Meant as a joke, Buzz Killington. And in fact I live in the inner west. Many aboriginals living here.
 

abbeyroad

Active Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2008
Messages
891
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Oh God, they might....give our properties to the housos?! And tell us to buy a new house?!? FUCK I'VE LOST HOPE IN HUMANITY.
hahahahah you clearly have no idea what a socialist/communist revolution is supposed to be
 

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
What on earth are you harping on about. This is currently a tax. The fact that it will eventually merge into something else has nothing to do with my point.
oh thankyou lentern for a single poll from 2009 asking if people are in favour of a CARBON REDUCTION SCHEME (notice reduction scheme being the keyword, as opposed to tax)

When governments, public servants, economists, academics and law experts spoke about a "carbon tax" as a possible mechanism for the reduction of carbon they referred to a consumption tax on specific goods. In general discourse, placing a regulatory price on the production of carbon like this one was seriously considered a "carbon tax" any more than Tony Abbott's descriptions of Rudd's "CPRS" as a "Great Big New Tax" were treated seriously by any but the party faithful. A consumption tax on specific goods was the Greens Policy prior to 2010 for anyone who cared to read it.

The discussion of a regulatory price on the production of carbon as a "carbon tax" only entered the political lexicon after the 2010 election, you can see in this article http://www.theaustralian.com.au/nat...on-price-promise/story-fn59niix-1225907522983 that Gillard never ruled out placing a price on carbon production. It was a carbon tax in the sense that it was previously used which she ruled out.

It is fine to debate the merits of different forms of climate action, less so the need for climate action but still that's within the bounds of reason but can we finally stop this pathetic, delusory line of argument that she unequivocally and specifically ruled out the legislation which she has just enacted. It is just, plain wrong.
 

na110793

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
377
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
hahahahah you clearly have no idea what a socialist/communist revolution is supposed to be
Actually, up until last year I was a commie. And now I look back and think, " What the fuck was wrong with me?".
 

na110793

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
377
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
Just a quick question everyone: has cheese_cheese aka libfag ever sworn at anyone? Because he negative repp'd me and called me a cunt, just asking.
 
Last edited:

scuba_steve2121

On The Road To Serfdom
Joined
Dec 2, 2009
Messages
1,343
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
I don't care how any tries to sell this

this is a tax increase on the general public

governments should be spending less and cutting taxes

we are going in the wrong direction
 

muhahahahahaha

Active Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Messages
1,781
Location
Mars
Gender
Female
HSC
2010
Just a quick question everyone: has cheese_cheese aka libfag ever sworn at anyone? Because he negative repp'd me and called me a cunt, just asking.
neg repped me after i negged him, but he said that being a girl only prevented it for so long. lmao.
 

muhahahahahaha

Active Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Messages
1,781
Location
Mars
Gender
Female
HSC
2010
I don't care how any tries to sell this

this is a tax increase on the general public

governments should be spending less and cutting taxes

we are going in the wrong direction
this is true..one good thing about the old Howard days= zero debt...
sure we cut out funding from health and education sectors, but eh, at least we didnt have a massive black loan staring at us in the mirror.
 

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
I don't care how any tries to sell this

this is a tax increase on the general public

governments should be spending less and cutting taxes

we are going in the wrong direction
Which is a legitimate position to hold but this crap about her reneging on a promise is just lazy and misleading.
 

boris

Banned
Joined
May 6, 2004
Messages
4,671
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
this is true..one good thing about the old Howard days= zero debt...
sure we cut out funding from health and education sectors, but eh, at least we didnt have a massive black loan staring at us in the mirror.
the howard glory days
 

na110793

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
377
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
neg repped me after i negged him, but he said that being a girl only prevented it for so long. lmao.
Haha lol. I dunno about you guys, but I actually thought he was a troll to begin with. But after so long, he can't be still trollin'. It's just not good for long term mental health. So I've come to the conclusion that he's serious. Which scares the fuck out of me.
 

muhahahahahaha

Active Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Messages
1,781
Location
Mars
Gender
Female
HSC
2010
Which is a legitimate position to hold but this crap about her reneging on a promise is just lazy and misleading.
....but she lied to the people..she openly lied! changed her view about the carbon tax about 2 weeks after she was elected to the role of pm because she had a 'change of heart'...
same thing happened with Howard...stating that under his government there would never be a GST...well he lied too lol.
our whole government is based on feeding the australian people false promises.
 

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
the howard glory days
National Debt, which Howard and Costello campaigned on with their debt truck in 1995/1996, "$10,000 for every man, woman and child" "The Beazley blackhole" etc, National debt tripled under the Howard government.
 

muhahahahahaha

Active Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Messages
1,781
Location
Mars
Gender
Female
HSC
2010
Haha lol. I dunno about you guys, but I actually thought he was a troll to begin with. But after so long, he can't be still trollin'. It's just not good for long term mental health. So I've come to the conclusion that he's serious. Which scares the fuck out of me.
hahahaha i thought he was trollin at first too :) but yeah, he is 5reals.
 

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
....but she lied to the people..she openly lied! changed her view about the carbon tax about 2 weeks after she was elected to the role of pm because she had a 'change of heart'...
same thing happened with Howard...stating that under his government there would never be a GST...well he lied too lol.
our whole government is based on feeding the australian people false promises.
When governments, public servants, economists, academics and law experts spoke about a "carbon tax" as a possible mechanism for the reduction of carbon they referred to a consumption tax on specific goods. In general discourse, placing a regulatory price on the production of carbon like this one was seriously considered a "carbon tax" any more than Tony Abbott's descriptions of Rudd's "CPRS" as a "Great Big New Tax" were treated seriously by any but the party faithful. A consumption tax on specific goods was the Greens Policy prior to 2010 for anyone who cared to read it.

The discussion of a regulatory price on the production of carbon as a "carbon tax" only entered the political lexicon after the 2010 election, you can see in this article http://www.theaustralian.com.au/nati...-1225907522983 that Gillard never ruled out placing a price on carbon production. It was a carbon tax in the sense that it was previously used which she ruled out.

It is fine to debate the merits of different forms of climate action, less so the need for climate action but still that's within the bounds of reason but can we finally stop this pathetic, delusory line of argument that she unequivocally and specifically ruled out the legislation which she has just enacted. It is just, plain wrong.
.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top