hayabusaboston
Well-Known Member
plz assess for worthiness
Leadership is a conceptual framework of understanding ascribed to the notion of successful guidance of a group by one or more individuals. The whole idea relies on positive relationships between a leader and his people. Thus we arrive at an assumption; a good leader must avoid hegemony, form good bonds with his people and maintain determination to assist his people were possible. This framework of ideas is explored in various depths in Shakespeare’s King
Lear as well as JR Tolkiens trilogy of novels, The Lord of the Rings.
Epideictic orations by a character in fictional works usually encompass a large revelation of some of the plots characteristics. Edmund delivers such an oration, a soliloquy expressing his great determination and cerebral strength. Shakespeare paints an image here of Edmunds importance, accentuating his ability to manipulate social networks to his will. As described in the story itself, Edmund despises society for renouncing him over his brother Edgar, who stands a noble, while Edmund a bastard remains. In his speech, “Thou nature art my goddess, to thy laws my services are bound…Now gods, stand up for bastards!” we are given the implication of a starting campaign of Edmunds, in his quest to escape the censure of society.
The insatiable avarice humans possess for material and social gain is what drives them to seek out these things. Edmund’s desire to transcend social barriers as a bastard, in itself, provides an image of contrast; an underdog rising up to power. This framing device of “reputation vs destination” allows Shakespeare to craft a multitude of situations which always unfold in Edmunds favour. When Edmund comes to “receive” a letter from Edgar, his father Gloucester is shocked to read it. He then tells the reader, “A credulous father and a brother noble, who’s nature is so far from doing harm” with a virile tone of authority in his voice, a quality created by Shakespeare to further emphasise his cerebral dominance, exemplified by his ability to trap Gloucester in his web of fictitious ideals.
False assumptions between characters in fiction often give rise to more varied situational outcomes. The red herring Edmund creates with his “Letter from Edgar” provides just that, restructuring the entire familial bond between Gloucester and Edgar. Shakespeare’s portrayal of the scenario allows the reader to sympathise with Gloucester and Edgar on account of their relationship being torn to shreds at the hands of Edmund. When Edmund then see Edgar, he instructs him to remain armed at all times, and to head for his lodging. “Pray ye go, there’s my key, and if you do stir abroad, be armed”. Here Shakespeare illustrates another
example of deceptive leadership.
Alternate expressions of leadership develop one’s ability to appreciate the different characteristics of different leaders. This is imminent in Frodo from LOTR, a vastly different character to Edmund. Frodo is portrayed as a “mere hobbit”, but one who comes into possession of an incredible power, “The one ring to rule them all”. This ring depicts a perfect example of Chekhov’s gun, its properties mysterious and unknown until a further revelatory moment in the story. The stark contrast of his task against his racial reputation is amplified by Tolkien.
Often a symbolic event in a story is representative of critical moments at that time. An example lies in LOTR, wherein Frodo’s company experiences a progressive dwindling of its members . This pathetic fallacy is representative of the greater independence required of Frodo, in the changing situations his group faces. Tolkien here explores the concept of social magnitude, and its effect on Frodo’s ability to continue. Frodo’s leadership qualities are put to the test, both in terms of social ability and fortitude to fight adversity.
Rapid decision making is often required in critical leadership situations. An example is in LOTR, where, after Frodo escapes Boromir’s accost in the Forest, he encounters Sam. Sam demands “Im going with you!” (To mount doom). Frodo accepts this. The new connective rapport between Frodo and Sam helps to reduce the lingering pathos of solitude for Frodo, and promotes ideals of his success. Shakespeare portrays here the influence Sam has over Frodo’s leadership decisions.
Occasionally Tolkien gives the position of power to minor characters. This occurs when Sam and Frodo are bickering over whether to “Keep him” (Gollum), putting Gollum in a light of dejected innocence as well as the position of power. He can choose to maintain secrecy or give into deceit. Then, following an aspersion to Sam’s request to help with the Ring, Frodo exclaims, “It’s my task, my own!” implying to the reader that the ring is altering his personality, adding a darker element of avarice, and forcing him to battle against its power. This puts a strain on Frodo’s leadership efficiency, a contrast to Edmund of King Lear, who continuously accretes his power.
In summation, the texts “King Lear” and “The Lord of the Rings” give not only a practical application of the leadership framework but drive thematic patterning in their respective storylines. Overall, in King Lear, through Edmund, Shakespeare analyses the concept of *the necessitation of altruism and justice into all leadership scenarios, as well as the idea of hamartia. On the same note, Frodo, in the Lord of the Rings, is portrayed by Shakespeare to be the ultimate miniscule figure of success, overcoming obstacles and adversity with the strength, skill and determination of a born leader. Tolkien thus teaches the importance of will, and that the greatest power is vested in it.
Leadership is a conceptual framework of understanding ascribed to the notion of successful guidance of a group by one or more individuals. The whole idea relies on positive relationships between a leader and his people. Thus we arrive at an assumption; a good leader must avoid hegemony, form good bonds with his people and maintain determination to assist his people were possible. This framework of ideas is explored in various depths in Shakespeare’s King
Lear as well as JR Tolkiens trilogy of novels, The Lord of the Rings.
Epideictic orations by a character in fictional works usually encompass a large revelation of some of the plots characteristics. Edmund delivers such an oration, a soliloquy expressing his great determination and cerebral strength. Shakespeare paints an image here of Edmunds importance, accentuating his ability to manipulate social networks to his will. As described in the story itself, Edmund despises society for renouncing him over his brother Edgar, who stands a noble, while Edmund a bastard remains. In his speech, “Thou nature art my goddess, to thy laws my services are bound…Now gods, stand up for bastards!” we are given the implication of a starting campaign of Edmunds, in his quest to escape the censure of society.
The insatiable avarice humans possess for material and social gain is what drives them to seek out these things. Edmund’s desire to transcend social barriers as a bastard, in itself, provides an image of contrast; an underdog rising up to power. This framing device of “reputation vs destination” allows Shakespeare to craft a multitude of situations which always unfold in Edmunds favour. When Edmund comes to “receive” a letter from Edgar, his father Gloucester is shocked to read it. He then tells the reader, “A credulous father and a brother noble, who’s nature is so far from doing harm” with a virile tone of authority in his voice, a quality created by Shakespeare to further emphasise his cerebral dominance, exemplified by his ability to trap Gloucester in his web of fictitious ideals.
False assumptions between characters in fiction often give rise to more varied situational outcomes. The red herring Edmund creates with his “Letter from Edgar” provides just that, restructuring the entire familial bond between Gloucester and Edgar. Shakespeare’s portrayal of the scenario allows the reader to sympathise with Gloucester and Edgar on account of their relationship being torn to shreds at the hands of Edmund. When Edmund then see Edgar, he instructs him to remain armed at all times, and to head for his lodging. “Pray ye go, there’s my key, and if you do stir abroad, be armed”. Here Shakespeare illustrates another
example of deceptive leadership.
Alternate expressions of leadership develop one’s ability to appreciate the different characteristics of different leaders. This is imminent in Frodo from LOTR, a vastly different character to Edmund. Frodo is portrayed as a “mere hobbit”, but one who comes into possession of an incredible power, “The one ring to rule them all”. This ring depicts a perfect example of Chekhov’s gun, its properties mysterious and unknown until a further revelatory moment in the story. The stark contrast of his task against his racial reputation is amplified by Tolkien.
Often a symbolic event in a story is representative of critical moments at that time. An example lies in LOTR, wherein Frodo’s company experiences a progressive dwindling of its members . This pathetic fallacy is representative of the greater independence required of Frodo, in the changing situations his group faces. Tolkien here explores the concept of social magnitude, and its effect on Frodo’s ability to continue. Frodo’s leadership qualities are put to the test, both in terms of social ability and fortitude to fight adversity.
Rapid decision making is often required in critical leadership situations. An example is in LOTR, where, after Frodo escapes Boromir’s accost in the Forest, he encounters Sam. Sam demands “Im going with you!” (To mount doom). Frodo accepts this. The new connective rapport between Frodo and Sam helps to reduce the lingering pathos of solitude for Frodo, and promotes ideals of his success. Shakespeare portrays here the influence Sam has over Frodo’s leadership decisions.
Occasionally Tolkien gives the position of power to minor characters. This occurs when Sam and Frodo are bickering over whether to “Keep him” (Gollum), putting Gollum in a light of dejected innocence as well as the position of power. He can choose to maintain secrecy or give into deceit. Then, following an aspersion to Sam’s request to help with the Ring, Frodo exclaims, “It’s my task, my own!” implying to the reader that the ring is altering his personality, adding a darker element of avarice, and forcing him to battle against its power. This puts a strain on Frodo’s leadership efficiency, a contrast to Edmund of King Lear, who continuously accretes his power.
In summation, the texts “King Lear” and “The Lord of the Rings” give not only a practical application of the leadership framework but drive thematic patterning in their respective storylines. Overall, in King Lear, through Edmund, Shakespeare analyses the concept of *the necessitation of altruism and justice into all leadership scenarios, as well as the idea of hamartia. On the same note, Frodo, in the Lord of the Rings, is portrayed by Shakespeare to be the ultimate miniscule figure of success, overcoming obstacles and adversity with the strength, skill and determination of a born leader. Tolkien thus teaches the importance of will, and that the greatest power is vested in it.
Last edited:
