CSSA Paper 2 - English Advanced (2 Viewers)

[jeffwu95]

ehhhh failed all modules

 

[mraznboy]

Omg that was teh hardest exam ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Fffffffff brb going to apply for uws

 

[Alkanes]

Module B >.>

Never expected they were going to ask that.

 

[Kimyia]

I was pretty happy with the paper! I maybe kinda slightly twisted the questions but pretty happy!! (...until I get the marks back lol)

 

[George121]

NO MORE ENGLISH

i am the happiest person alive right now.

the questions weren't too bad, and i finished with 10 minutes to spare.

expecting 40/60 (hopefully )

 

[louielouiee]

Did Cloudstreet need a personal voice, even though it didn't specify?

 

[Kimyia]

What was everyone's thesis for Frankenblade?

 

[Demise]

What was everyone's thesis for Frankenblade?

Some crap about how different contexts show that the values still remain, and the impacts of technology. I can't remember, it's all a blur.

 

[Kimyia]

I have no idea if what i did was right but what i did do was say that differences and similarities in the themes reveal the same about their contexts....

 

[George121]

I think i just messed up that question.. i spoke about the difference in appearance of the characters even though the texts did show similar ideas :/

Oh well, its all about the hsc, trials mean nothing when paper 2 is only 12%

 

[Demise]

I have no idea if what i did was right but what i did do was say that differences and similarities in the themes reveal the same about their contexts....

Their contexts differed significantly...

... Didn't it?

Fuck...

 

[Brett_P]

Yes! What a relief that's over. Overall, not a bad paper.

Module A my thesis was "The differences between parallel scenarios, specifically the development and implications of artificial life, reveal their respective contexts"

Module B rolled me, I only knew two essays...luckily my English teacher loves Feminism and we went over Atwood's essay in depth, enough for me to use a lot of filler and add it to my essay - everything was misquoted. Does Atwood call feminists "butch" anywhere in there? I sure hope so.

Module C was really good, it was just a typical question that had been thrown at a thesaurus. Very relieved it didn't require two ORT's.

All in all, relieved!

Let the LOGICAL subjects begin!

 

[onedaysnotice]

IM FREEEEEE!!!! DDD

I didn't do as bad as I thought I would actually o.o Well I did at lot better than yesterday's paper that's for sure. Maybe i might have a chance for unsw, albeit a tiny one xD

Module A (Frankenblade) and Module C (Ted Hughes) were fine. I bs'ed Hamlet to oblivion though xD

and FREE DAY TOMORROW!!!! > But then I have to study for my religion and cafs double for thurs... T^T

 

[Kimyia]

Their contexts differed significantly...

... Didn't it?

Fuck...

yeah sorry, i meant that one didn't reveal more but they reveal the same amount about their differing contexts.

 

[George121]

yeah sorry, i meant that one didn't reveal more but they reveal the same amount about their differing contexts.

so the question was asking about the context, not the characters?

oh fuck.

 

[vanessa1234]

DID ANYONE DO HISTORY AND MEMORY?!!
I had prepared for the RELATIONSHIP between them, not the conflict! aaah!
was it ok to say, they're conflicted but they can also work together??

For module A - do you also have to talk about similarities or just differences, to prove theyre stronger?

Goood luck everyone for results!

 

[Kimyia]

so the question was asking about the context, not the characters?

oh fuck.

i don't know lol thats why i was hoping what i did might make sense to other people. as long as you can support your thesis, it should be fine. the question was pretty open to interpretation.

 

[George121]

i don't know lol thats why i was hoping what i did might make sense to other people. as long as you can support your thesis, it should be fine. the question was pretty open to interpretation.

i thought it would be good to talk about the characters, cause the question didn't actually specify the context, it just said "differences reveal more than similarities" and the different appearances/ideas through the main characters led to their death, portraying a similar consequence (i actually mentioned the similar consequence part)

If i get 5/20 for that essay, i'll be happy.

same with Hamlet

 

[Amleops]

Went pretty well I thought. Better than Paper 1 in my opinion.

Module C question was a bit tricky at times, Module B required some deeper thinking than usual, and Module A was a bit rushed at the end since I did it last, but overall, it definitely wasn't as bad as what I thought it would be.

 

[George121]

I DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW PEOPLE FIND PAPER 2 EASIER THAN PAPER 1

paper 1 is only 45 marks, and the concept is easy

paper 2 is just retarded.