I also used simultaneous equations. Because I and k are the same in both, just like x and y in your standard simultaneous equation. So really you could have done anything you do to any other simultaneous question, and dividing was the best option to eliminate Iyeah thanks after that I'm good, just want to know why you divided (1) by (2)? thats what the answers had
i tried to work it out by using simultenous equations
Dividing two equations is still simulatenous equations...really? i tried making Io the subject for one of the equations then subing it into another, but that didn't seen to work
That also works:really? i tried making Io the subject for one of the equations then subing it into another, but that didn't seen to work
haha yeah thats the way i did it, i guess i just had a mental blank and stopped , anyway thanksThat also works:
Though the other way is probably quicker.
I do know what I'm doing, but I've never seen the division simulatenous equation before. Its new to me.The best way to do a math exam, is actually knowing what you are doing rather than blindly following standard process, being able to find a clever substitution or algebra technique is a skill that is highly needed for math.
You might have used it when doing geometric progression questions where you are given two terms (i.e 3rd and 7th) and you have to find the common ratio and first term.I do know what I'm doing, but I've never seen the division simulatenous equation before. Its new to me.
Yeah i remember that, ah that too is a simultaneous equationYou might have used it when doing geometric progression questions where you are given two terms (i.e 3rd and 7th) and you have to find the common ratio and first term.
Yep same concept here.Yeah i remember that, ah that too is a simultaneous equation