• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

HSC 2013 MX2 Marathon (archive) (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

First find the function f(t) such that the equality holds:





For F the primitive of f:




















I have a feeling this argument is not valid but I cant see it right now, its a bit late
Your f is indeed the unique function which gives us equality for all t >= 0 (*), but I don't know how you are deducing that any g satisfying the integral inequality must be smaller than f everywhere (which is what we are aiming for).

(*) Your method of showing this is mostly okay, but the division by something that is potentially (a priori) negative or zero does raise some niggling potential problems...thankfully none of them crop up here so don't worry about this.
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon





Integrating everything gives:





Take



Yep this is pretty much it, although I would suggest that for your first step you use a dummy variable such as z, then integrating from 0 to x.

EDIT: I probably should of put the conditions on x
 
Last edited:

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon



by the product rule, fundamental theorem of calculus, and our assumed integral inequality.

Replacing t with r and integrating this expression from r=0 to r=t gives:



Hence we can conclude that:



Our working is valid for all non-negative t.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top