Renegader
Member
What does "the right to be judged by peers" even mean?
I (obviously from my paper) got D. I picked d on the fact that I interpreted peers as jury, and via the transition of indictable to summary (District court->Local court) there is the removal of juries from the transition. As for the right for lawyers I was thinking about it but i didn't pick it because I remembered this articleI wasn't sure about 20, it depends on how you interpret the word "applies" - because the executive arm of government also refers to the governor general so by applies if it means make it into law then yeah...
And for 12 I did C because a forfeiture of an asset doesn't really rehabilitate you, it's more of a punishment, so I guess it's retribution.
(Also, what did you guys do for 17?)
In indictable offences, Dietrich v The Queen established that a case may be held until the defendant can seek legal representation. (I have no idea though, I was pretty confident about MC and now I feel shit lel)I'm not sure but I think your 17 may be wrong. No one has an automatic right to legal representation (established in Dietrich v the Queen)
Depends on where they draw the line for marking I guessI (obviously from my paper) got D. I picked d on the fact that I interpreted peers as jury, and via the transition of indictable to summary (District court->Local court) there is the removal of juries from the transition. As for the right for lawyers I was thinking about it but i didn't pick it because I remembered this article
http://www.smh.com.au/comment/legal-aid-now-just-a-bandaid-20130516-2jp8j.html
>Implying legal aid/lawyer was available for local courts before budget cuts
I'm keen on seeing other people's perspectives
I did D for 17.I wasn't sure about 20, it depends on how you interpret the word "applies" - because the executive arm of government also refers to the governor general so by applies if it means make it into law then yeah...
And for 12 I did C because a forfeiture of an asset doesn't really rehabilitate you, it's more of a punishment, so I guess it's retribution.
(Also, what did you guys do for 17?)
I (obviously from my paper) got D. I picked d on the fact that I interpreted peers as jury, and via the transition of indictable to summary (District court->Local court) there is the removal of juries from the transition. As for the right for lawyers I was thinking about it but i didn't pick it because I remembered this article
http://www.smh.com.au/comment/legal-aid-now-just-a-bandaid-20130516-2jp8j.html
>Implying legal aid/lawyer was available for local courts before budget cuts
I'm keen on seeing other people's perspectives
HahahahahahaahDamn, I think you're right. That's some crazy multiple choice examining you've done there.
I did B! I was pretty certain it has a magistrate.I think 11 is b
"Sentencing: Magistrate determines sentence."
http://www.creativespirits.info/aboriginalculture/law/circle-sentencing
ConfirmedI think 11 is b
"Sentencing: Magistrate determines sentence."
http://www.creativespirits.info/aboriginalculture/law/circle-sentencing
hahahahahhaha fuckConfirmed
Excel, HSC Legal studies: "The magistrate ensures the sentence is appropriate to the offence and the circumstances"
lol fuck
fucking rekthahahahahhaha fuck
dwfucking rekt
A bit off topic but would you be right if you talked about police discretion (ie. police issuing fines, warning, etc). It's not directly under sentencing and punishment but seems to relate.dw
exam wasn't that easy
I know lots of kids who screwed it from other schools
this guy called me and said he accidently talked about discretion in general, and forgot to see sentencing and punishment
it'll align well
not reallyA bit off topic but would you be right if you talked about police discretion (ie. police issuing fines, warning, etc). It's not directly under sentencing and punishment but seems to relate.
This was my interpretation as well. Hope it's correct!I (obviously from my paper) got D. I picked d on the fact that I interpreted peers as jury, and via the transition of indictable to summary (District court->Local court) there is the removal of juries from the transition. As for the right for lawyers I was thinking about it but i didn't pick it because I remembered this article
http://www.smh.com.au/comment/legal-aid-now-just-a-bandaid-20130516-2jp8j.html
>Implying legal aid/lawyer was available for local courts before budget cuts
I'm keen on seeing other people's perspectives
WHATdrug court gets me yet again
yeah court of criminal appeal is rightWHAT
tell me the answer was nsw court of criminal appeal
lol please
omg