Multiple Choice (3 Viewers)

[Renegader]

What does "the right to be judged by peers" even mean?

 

[Examine]

I wasn't sure about 20, it depends on how you interpret the word "applies" - because the executive arm of government also refers to the governor general so by applies if it means make it into law then yeah...

And for 12 I did C because a forfeiture of an asset doesn't really rehabilitate you, it's more of a punishment, so I guess it's retribution.

(Also, what did you guys do for 17?)

I (obviously from my paper) got D. I picked d on the fact that I interpreted peers as jury, and via the transition of indictable to summary (District court->Local court) there is the removal of juries from the transition. As for the right for lawyers I was thinking about it but i didn't pick it because I remembered this article
http://www.smh.com.au/comment/legal-aid-now-just-a-bandaid-20130516-2jp8j.html
>Implying legal aid/lawyer was available for local courts before budget cuts

I'm keen on seeing other people's perspectives

 

[loversinjapan]

I'm not sure but I think your 17 may be wrong. No one has an automatic right to legal representation (established in Dietrich v the Queen)

In indictable offences, Dietrich v The Queen established that a case may be held until the defendant can seek legal representation. (I have no idea though, I was pretty confident about MC and now I feel shit lel)

I (obviously from my paper) got D. I picked d on the fact that I interpreted peers as jury, and via the transition of indictable to summary (District court->Local court) there is the removal of juries from the transition. As for the right for lawyers I was thinking about it but i didn't pick it because I remembered this article
http://www.smh.com.au/comment/legal-aid-now-just-a-bandaid-20130516-2jp8j.html
>Implying legal aid/lawyer was available for local courts before budget cuts

I'm keen on seeing other people's perspectives

Depends on where they draw the line for marking I guess

 

[Candidate]

I wasn't sure about 20, it depends on how you interpret the word "applies" - because the executive arm of government also refers to the governor general so by applies if it means make it into law then yeah...

And for 12 I did C because a forfeiture of an asset doesn't really rehabilitate you, it's more of a punishment, so I guess it's retribution.

(Also, what did you guys do for 17?)

I did D for 17.

 

[Renegader]

I (obviously from my paper) got D. I picked d on the fact that I interpreted peers as jury, and via the transition of indictable to summary (District court->Local court) there is the removal of juries from the transition. As for the right for lawyers I was thinking about it but i didn't pick it because I remembered this article
http://www.smh.com.au/comment/legal-aid-now-just-a-bandaid-20130516-2jp8j.html
>Implying legal aid/lawyer was available for local courts before budget cuts

I'm keen on seeing other people's perspectives

Damn, I think you're right. That's some crazy multiple choice examining you've done there.

 

[bottletopman]

I think 11 is b
"Sentencing: Magistrate determines sentence."
http://www.creativespirits.info/aboriginalculture/law/circle-sentencing

 

[Examine]

Damn, I think you're right. That's some crazy multiple choice examining you've done there.

Hahahahahahaah

I think i'm sitting on 17-19/20 atm, 18 is confirmed wrong lol (need to lern more about my parliamentzzz)

 

[iPhone4]

I said 11D....role of the victim in circle sentencing?

Oh god, if I got 11, 12, 17, 18, 20 wrong just laters ATAR laters Band 6

 

[Candidate]

I think 11 is b
"Sentencing: Magistrate determines sentence."
http://www.creativespirits.info/aboriginalculture/law/circle-sentencing

I did B! I was pretty certain it has a magistrate.

 

[Examine]

I think 11 is b
"Sentencing: Magistrate determines sentence."
http://www.creativespirits.info/aboriginalculture/law/circle-sentencing

Confirmed

Excel, HSC Legal studies: "The magistrate ensures the sentence is appropriate to the offence and the circumstances"

lol fuck

 

[Spiritual Being]

Confirmed

Excel, HSC Legal studies: "The magistrate ensures the sentence is appropriate to the offence and the circumstances"

lol fuck

hahahahahhaha fuck

 

[Examine]

hahahahahhaha fuck

fucking rekt

 

[Spiritual Being]

fucking rekt

dw

exam wasn't that easy

I know lots of kids who screwed it from other schools

this guy called me and said he accidently talked about discretion in general, and forgot to see sentencing and punishment

it'll align well

 

[YuMaNuMa]

dw

exam wasn't that easy

I know lots of kids who screwed it from other schools

this guy called me and said he accidently talked about discretion in general, and forgot to see sentencing and punishment

it'll align well

A bit off topic but would you be right if you talked about police discretion (ie. police issuing fines, warning, etc). It's not directly under sentencing and punishment but seems to relate.

 

[Spiritual Being]

A bit off topic but would you be right if you talked about police discretion (ie. police issuing fines, warning, etc). It's not directly under sentencing and punishment but seems to relate.

not really

you can talk about how discretion rectifies discretion

e.g. case about wrongful search due to discretion, is referenced in the discretion of the judge's sentence

I heard people doing it like that

just focus on court cases and their sentences

for that section, I'll get like 13/15

 

[SuperMike96]

I (obviously from my paper) got D. I picked d on the fact that I interpreted peers as jury, and via the transition of indictable to summary (District court->Local court) there is the removal of juries from the transition. As for the right for lawyers I was thinking about it but i didn't pick it because I remembered this article
http://www.smh.com.au/comment/legal-aid-now-just-a-bandaid-20130516-2jp8j.html
>Implying legal aid/lawyer was available for local courts before budget cuts

I'm keen on seeing other people's perspectives

This was my interpretation as well. Hope it's correct!

 

[lolwot]

drug court gets me yet again

 

[Spiritual Being]

drug court gets me yet again

WHAT

tell me the answer was nsw court of criminal appeal

lol please

omg

 

[lolwot]

WHAT

tell me the answer was nsw court of criminal appeal

lol please

omg

yeah court of criminal appeal is right

i just always choose drug court in exams because it sounds right lol

but hopefully i'll get 17/18

 

[Candidate]

I did the Drug Court because it said 'review' and not 'appeal', and i figured an appeal would go to the Supreme Court anyway.

Doesn't matter, I fucked up both peace rights and education.