HSC 2015 MX2 Integration Marathon (archive) (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ekman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2014
Messages
1,615
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

The substitution (x = sec(u)) morphs the integrands to ∫tanu/(|tanu|) du and the sign is dependent on the values of x or bounds of the original integral

Either I've overlooked something or you overlooked something lol
But why does the tanu have absolute signs. Because whenever I had to trig sub something into an integral to get rid of a square root sign, I never had to consider the absolute signs. This is actually the first I have seen something like this
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Technically you SHOULD consider absolute value signs to get a full solution generally speaking (because √(t2) = |t|), but somehow they don't seem to bother with it much in the HSC.
 
Last edited:

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

A less impossible integral, seeing as the past few integrals have been symmetric substitution type integrals.

 

kawaiipotato

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2015
Messages
463
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Saw this question online



idk why it doesn't work . Show \int_0^1 (-xlnx)^n / (n!) dx = (n+1)^{-(n+1)}
 
Last edited:

Ekman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2014
Messages
1,615
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Saw this question online



idk why it doesn't work . Show \int_0^1 (-xlnx)^n / (n!) dx = (n+1)^{-(n+1)}














Can someone please tell me where I went wrong with the (-1)^n
 
Last edited:

Ekman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2014
Messages
1,615
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Were you using by parts?
Yes. Its a different form of IBP, where instead of establishing u, u' and v, v', you just find a function and shape it in a way such that when it is differentiated, one term will provide the integral desired.
 

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,650
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Did you just assume ? as x approaches 0
 

kawaiipotato

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2015
Messages
463
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Care to prove it? I'm not complaining, since that's the only way you can have a definite area
L'hopital's would show it approaches 0^- but that's not really a proof
 

Ekman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2014
Messages
1,615
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Care to prove it? I'm not complaining, since that's the only way you can have a definite area
You can prove it graphically or you can use L'hopital's rule. The reason why I just made it equal to 0 straight away was because I already knew that the limit went to 0, but under exam conditions I would of proved it via L'hopital's to make the working out more mathematically correct.
 

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,650
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

You can prove it graphically or you can use L'hopital's rule. The reason why I just made it equal to 0 straight away was because I already knew that the limit went to 0, but under exam conditions I would of proved it via L'hopital's to make the working out more mathematically correct.
How is it possible to even prove that using L'hoptial's rule? It involves differntiating top and bottom and subbing in the limit

 

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon















Can someone please tell me where I went wrong with the (-1)^n
When you differentiate the LHS of that IBP, the negative from the outside is cancelled out by the negative from the x term. Therefore, the LHS should be a sum of terms. This one mistake correction will telescope throughout your entire working and your answer should be correct.
 

Ekman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2014
Messages
1,615
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

When you differentiate the LHS of that IBP, the negative from the outside is cancelled out by the negative from the x term. Therefore, the LHS should be a sum of terms. This one mistake correction will telescope throughout your entire working and your answer should be correct.
Ah yes, makes sense now. Thanks!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top