HSC 2015 MX2 Integration Marathon (archive) (5 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

snail489

Member
Joined
May 1, 2015
Messages
43
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon



are real non-zero constants
Should look like this:
cd26243eac.png

Did this by dividing through b^4 tan^4x and then splitting the numerator into two fractions. Then substituting u^(1/3) = (a/b)tanx and w=(a/b)tanx. Then it simplifies into algebraic integrals like 1/(w^4+1) which can be evaluated using partial fractions. Although I think I probably did some unnecessary steps (as per usual) since half my answer cancelled out at the final step.
 

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,650
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Tabular IBP takes care of it nicely without it really seeming like 7 applications of IBP.
Doesn't tabular integration only work when the function is differentiated infinite times and its still not 0 ? How can we use that if its 0 eventually?
 

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Doesn't tabular integration only work when the function is differentiated infinite times and its still not 0 ? How can we use that if its 0 eventually?
No?

Tabular integration by parts is mechanically identical to repeated applications of integration by parts. It just arranges things in a neater manner (the table) that makes the iterations a lot cleaner to work with.
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Tabular integration was popularised in the movie Stand and Deliver.
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Assuming the n should be an r or vice versa, any hint on the reduction formula? I got scared doing sin(n-1)xcos(x)+cos(n-1)xsin(x)
 

Drongoski

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
4,255
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2015 Integration Marathon

Another way.

Say:



The geometrical meaning: f(a+b-x) is mirror image of f(x) on the y-axis, shifted right by a+b units. It can be shown that the area associated with I is the same area as the new definite integral.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 5)

Top