General thoughts: HSC chemistry 2015 (5 Viewers)

Bozzin8R

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
32
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Confirm, I had something like that
splendid haha, went from people telling me I was wrong because of something to do with ACETIC acid to now hopefully being right - bumps my short answers up by 2 marks which is always nice
 

Bozzin8R

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
32
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
I got 0.181 (3sf.) lol
Was the question something like 25mL citric at 0.100mol/L reacts with sodium hydroxide and avg sodium hydroxide was 41.5mL?
The only reason I'm thinking this may be wrong is by looking at it logically - if 25mL of 0.1mol citric (weak) acid needed 41.5mL of NaOH (strong), it would make sense that the NaOH would be more dilute than this acid? Correct me if Im wrong here
 

kawaiipotato

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2015
Messages
463
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
The only reason I'm thinking this may be wrong is by looking at it logically - if 25mL of 0.1mol citric (weak) acid needed 41.5mL of NaOH (strong), it would make sense that the NaOH would be more dilute than this acid? Correct me if Im wrong here
That sounds logical. But they gave amount of citric needed to neutralise it anyway so wouldn't this already mean it takes into account the weakness of it?

C6H8O7 + 3NaOH ---> Na3C6H5O7 + 3H2O

nC6H807 = 0.1*0.025 = 0.0025
nNaOH = 0.0025*3 = 0.0075
[NaOH] = 0.0075/0.0415 = 0.108mol/L
I have a feeling I just lost out on 4 marks now
 

Librah

Not_the_pad
Joined
Oct 28, 2013
Messages
912
Location
Sydney Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
The only reason I'm thinking this may be wrong is by looking at it logically - if 25mL of 0.1mol citric (weak) acid needed 41.5mL of NaOH (strong), it would make sense that the NaOH would be more dilute than this acid? Correct me if Im wrong here
wat
 

Ekman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2014
Messages
1,615
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
splendid haha, went from people telling me I was wrong because of something to do with ACETIC acid to now hopefully being right - bumps my short answers up by 2 marks which is always nice
Sorry, I just looked through the question again and I got the same answer as librah (I remember the multiplying the moles by 3 to get 0.0075, and dividing by 0.0415 to get 0.181).

I must of remembered 0.006 from some other question I did last night.

Edit: I remembered it from the 2014 hsc paper I did last night, where the answer to question 30 a was 0.005
 
Last edited:

malcolm21

Active Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2014
Messages
437
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
for that citric acid one i forgot it was triprotic thought it was mono for some reason but did the working out and got the answer off by a 3 factor, what do you think ill get for it, its bullshit that was a 4 marker, 2 or 3 marker at most man
 

CookieMan999

New Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2014
Messages
7
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
cellulose.png

I picked B for the polymer in Q11 because as in glucose, two hydroxyl groups (OH) condense to expel a H2O and leave only ONE oxygen atom to form the link. None of the other options display this.

D looked correct at first but having an oxygen on both sides would mean that they had condensed to form H2 (similarly for C, 2 oxygens are in the middle for the link instead of one from condesation). A proper answer should have had D but with one less O on one side.
 
Last edited:

HecticLad

Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2014
Messages
78
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
View attachment 32594

I picked B for the polymer in Q11 because as in glucose, two hydroxyl groups (OH) condense to expel a H2O and leave only ONE oxygen atom to form the link. None of the other options display this.

D looked correct at first but having an oxygen on both sides would mean that they had condensed to form H2 (similarly for C, 2 oxygens are in the middle for the link instead of one from condesation). A proper answer should have had D but with one less O on one side.
Im probabaly thinking way too much into it, but maybe it wasnt necessarily H2O that was condensed out, as condensation polymerization can refer to the release of any small molecule, not just H2O, maybe it could have been H2 or methanol instead although, but otherwise, all the options on there are technically wrong, could just send some complaints in about it tbh
 

nerdz1

New Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
16
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Im probabaly thinking way too much into it, but maybe it wasnt necessarily H2O that was condensed out, as condensation polymerization can refer to the release of any small molecule, not just H2O, maybe it could have been H2 or methanol instead although, but otherwise, all the options on there are technically wrong, could just send some complaints in about it tbh
Yeah I think you're thinking way into it lol. BOS generally never extends into condensation with H2 or methanol product.
 

nerdz1

New Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
16
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
What do you guys think an 85 would align to?
This won't be helpful but tbh nobody can say definitively. Even though the general consensus seems to be that it was an "easy" paper, we still need to see how the state goes holistically. Also mark alignment can change dramatically from year to year, from memory, 85 went to 95 in one year whilst 90 went to 94 in another year. So yeah, it's a little bit hard to predict.
 

BillKyriakos

New Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
13
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
This won't be helpful but tbh nobody can say definitively. Even though the general consensus seems to be that it was an "easy" paper, we still need to see how the state goes holistically. Also mark alignment can change dramatically from year to year, from memory, 85 went to 95 in one year whilst 90 went to 94 in another year. So yeah, it's a little bit hard to predict.
That's fair. Thanks for the response
 

iforgotmyname

Metallic Oxide
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Messages
733
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
I got 10.6?
For the industrial question, Moles were

0.5 + 1 -> 2.5. Where the one with 0.5 mole has 2 in front and rest has 1 in front

It said the one with 0.5 moles had change (increase) in concentration of 0.36 moles.

This will mean that the one with 1 mole will increase by 0.36x2 (due to the ratio being 2:1 between 0.5 molar and 1molar substance on lhs) This will also mean that (00.36x2) 2.5 moles product will be consumed to make the lhs reaction.

You divide everything by 2 thus yielding you

0.43 + 0.86 -> 0.89 thus equilibrum constant will be around 5.59

Idk is this right or did I fk up the molar ratio
 

Vizsla

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2014
Messages
45
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
If i left my answer as 0.1807 (stressing out bout this) will i lose a mark as i think its one too many sf
 
Last edited:

BlueGas

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
2,448
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
If i left my answer as 0.1807 (stressing out bout this) will i lose a mark as i think its one too many sf
What question was this again? I remember I got the same answer and I left the answer as 0.18
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 5)

Top