ProdigyInspired
Tafe Advocate
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2014
- Messages
- 643
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2016
I recently purchased the fx-100AU for its imaginary functions, but also as a main calculator since my fx-82ES is starting to die.
When I'm converting Radians to Degrees in Deg Mode, it works fine [ pi (SHIFT->ANS->r)] makes 180 etc etc.
However the opposite doesn't work as well - converting Degrees to Radians in Rad Mode. I put [180 (SHIFT->ANS->o)], and it gives me pi, as expected, but in the numeral form (3.14~~). In my fx-82ES, which I'm unsure of since it does convert trigonometric values automatically into fractions, I did the same thing and it gives me pi in the symbol form. A better example is for 270 degrees. [270 (SHIFT->ANS->o)] on my fx-82ES gives me 3/2 pi, whereas my fx-100AU gives me 4.7 instead of pi.
Is anyone else having this issue or is it intentional that you're not meant to be able to convert degrees into radians? Found this when I was trying to find arg of complex numbers.
When I'm converting Radians to Degrees in Deg Mode, it works fine [ pi (SHIFT->ANS->r)] makes 180 etc etc.
However the opposite doesn't work as well - converting Degrees to Radians in Rad Mode. I put [180 (SHIFT->ANS->o)], and it gives me pi, as expected, but in the numeral form (3.14~~). In my fx-82ES, which I'm unsure of since it does convert trigonometric values automatically into fractions, I did the same thing and it gives me pi in the symbol form. A better example is for 270 degrees. [270 (SHIFT->ANS->o)] on my fx-82ES gives me 3/2 pi, whereas my fx-100AU gives me 4.7 instead of pi.
Is anyone else having this issue or is it intentional that you're not meant to be able to convert degrees into radians? Found this when I was trying to find arg of complex numbers.