HSC 2016 Maths Marathon (archive) (3 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nailgun

Cole World
Joined
Jun 14, 2014
Messages
2,193
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: HSC 2016 2U Marathon

erm I never really understood that notation, that's why I kinda just use the y'
It worked so far so I guess I just went with it
Why would you need to differentiate the (sinx)^n though? Wouldnt you end up with

btw im not trying to argue or anything im just a bit confused
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2016 2U Marathon



I think you completely missed the fact that x is the variable we're differentiating with respect to. Not the entire sin(x) quantity.

So the derivative of the inside itself is already tedious enough, and then you have to multiply the little extra of the derivative of the whole thing.

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=d/dx+pi^((sinx)^n)
 
Last edited:

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2016 2U Marathon





Because the dot technically ends the functionality of the derivative operator. Need a bracket around the entire expression for it to become a product rule question
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2016 2U Marathon





Because the dot technically ends the functionality of the derivative operator. Need a bracket around the entire expression for it to become a product rule question
Guessing he (Drsoccerball) meant it to be a product rule and typo'ed, since there's not much point just randomly putting a factor next to it for no reason, as it'd just be "carried along for the ride", so to speak.
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2016 2U Marathon

Guessing he (Drsoccerball) meant it to be a product rule and typo'ed, since there's not much point just randomly putting a factor next to it for no reason, as it'd just be "carried along for the ride", so to speak.


Too long. Lazy to simplify and factor out the ...^(n-1)
 

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,650
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2016 2U Marathon

erm I never really understood that notation, that's why I kinda just use the y'
It worked so far so I guess I just went with it
Why would you need to differentiate the (sinx)^n though? Wouldnt you end up with

btw im not trying to argue or anything im just a bit confused
The way you differentiate exponentials are different to any other function you are differentiating. For this type of question instead of wasting a few lines with a u substitution you can do this:









 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2016 2U Marathon

The way you differentiate exponentials are different to any other function you are differentiating. For this type of question instead of wasting a few lines with a u substitution you can do this:









Note that had InteGrand not explained it, this is something a 2U student would never have thought about as it is far beyond the scope of the course. It's pretty much manipulating implicit differentiation.
 

Nailgun

Cole World
Joined
Jun 14, 2014
Messages
2,193
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: HSC 2016 2U Marathon



I think you completely missed the fact that x is the variable we're differentiating with respect to. Not the entire sin(x) quantity.

So the derivative of the inside itself is already tedious enough, and then you have to multiply the little extra of the derivative of the whole thing.

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=d/dx+pi^((sinx)^n)
Okay that actually helped heaps, I've never really thought of the chain rule as a formal process, it was kind of taught to me as multiply by the power and the derivative inside the brackets and subtract 1 from the power
Basically the top part or dy is what the original equation is equal to? And the bottom is what you are differentiating with respect too right
Chain rule is then splitting up an expression into a u part and a y part and then you can differentiate the whole yeah
Imma go back and try redo the question

Also the logarithic differentiation question (integrand)


EDIT: Having a mindblown moment now that the Leibniz notation actually makes some sense
 
Last edited:

Nailgun

Cole World
Joined
Jun 14, 2014
Messages
2,193
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: HSC 2016 2U Marathon

So is In y = In x always or are there like conditions?
Thats very useful though
 

Nailgun

Cole World
Joined
Jun 14, 2014
Messages
2,193
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: HSC 2016 2U Marathon

yeah thats what I meant
In y = In f(x)
Where y = f(x)

Which just made me realise that they're the same thing already
What was the special rule then? y'/y?
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2016 2U Marathon

yeah thats what I meant
In y = In f(x)
Where y = f(x)

Which just made me realise that they're the same thing already
What was the special rule then? y'/y?
 

Nailgun

Cole World
Joined
Jun 14, 2014
Messages
2,193
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: HSC 2016 2U Marathon

Oh right, I was aware of that since it was in my textbook, although it was never really used like that
I know its basically just another application of it, but generally like



I wouldn't of thought to take the log of both sides which is why I thought it was the special part lol
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2016 2U Marathon

Implicit differentiation is another direct consequence of the chain rule:



They call that logarithmic differentiation as a special case of it simply because of the ability to manipulate the power rule of logarithms.

Of course, and also because the process introduces a log temporarily itself.

The rule is somewhat broken in the event you have something like y=-x^2 and it's all negative.
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2016 2U Marathon

Of course, and also because the process introduces a log temporarily itself.

The rule is somewhat broken in the event you have something like y=-x^2 and it's all negative.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 3)

Top