You're a real piece of work aren't you?
You really want me to do this? Alright let's go. Now YOU need to have the open mind and be willing to learn.
First off, let's stop assuming things about you and ask how do you think life on earth has come to be the way it is today? If not evolution, what?
Secondly, why haven't you answered my question?
Thirdly, did you watch and read the links I gave you? Be honest. If no, I'll be happy to use them and quote them in response to whatever you say to help explain things.
Excuse me? Please give me names of scientists that are like that. And no I don't care about your stupid science teachers who need to go back to school themselves.
All scientific theories are based on evidence. If there was evidence that proved it false, then there you go. But that hasn't happened has it? There is evidence proving that evolution exists and has resulted in us and life around us. It's not even close to 'faith' which is something you believe in with NO evidence. Not even a little bit close.
EDIT: Also I will add, that I'd like you to respond to:
"if an animal micro-evolves 750 times, its going to be close to unrecognisable from its ancestors, which is macro evolution"
do you agree or disagree? Personally I think it's just simple logic to be able to understand if something is making slow minor changes over the years, for 3.6 BILLION years, clearly the end product is going to be a LOT different than what we started with. And if you can't put that 3.6 billion years into perspective, take a look at these graphics that may help:
http://waitbutwhy.com/2013/08/putting-time-in-perspective.html
Ok, I now have time to answer this...
Firstly, I don't see how my belief as to how the world came into being is relevant to the discussion of evolution as I haven't brought in external belief factors to my arguments. I don't think there is enough solid evidence for any theory and therefore I am still investigating. Also, if something like evolution is true, and we don't have souls or there is no after-life, I don't see how knowing that we are evolving is important to us, we're going to turn into a pile of dirt anyway.
Secondly, I don't understand what 'animals appearing seemingly out of nowhere in the timeline' even means. How do we know they didn't exist before then and that we just don't have fossils further back than the times we believe they existed? Scientists don't know what they haven't found yet (obviously) and therefore there is no need for further explanation to this question. Feel free to ask more about this if need be.
Thirdly, yes I did read the links but it's about the 'evidence' I've already learnt about. You can still use and quote them in response to what I say if you feel it to be fit to do so.
In order to answer your question on the scientists that don't believe in evolution, we need to define what a scientist is. (Also, does not agreeing with you mean they're stupid? lol) I found this article that I think explains it well (if you scroll down a bit):
http://www.scienceagainstevolution.org/v5i10f.htm
Feel free to ask more about this.
Ok, your second last question is a bit, to me, dumb and illogical. Just because something hasn't been proven wrong doesn't mean it's not wrong... This is an Argument from Ignorance (logical fallacy) and has no bearing on the argument. It's as if I said that unicorns exist, and you can't tell me otherwise unless you can prove they don't exist. And just because we haven't found one, doesn't mean they don't exist (they could just be really good at hiding). Same with God. What if I said he exists, and he has to exist unless you can prove he doesn't? Also, there are parts of evolution that have been proven to be wrong. If you are interested in seeing a creationist argue evolution (this guy is one of the best I've seen), then please check out:
Kent Hovind -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szBTl3S24MY
Please disregard his external life as it is a completely different topic and look at what he says. I completely understand if you don't listen to him, and you ignore it. He is not a creationist who just says 'The bible is true and that's why evolution doesn't exist' and he actually gives evidence as to why it is wrong. He also answers questions on YouTube regarding different aspects of evolution. DISCLAIMER: Just because I endorse what he says in regards to evolution does not mean I believe everything he does/says.
For your EDIT, we have to agree that the world is 3.6 BILLION years old. I don't believe so, as I don't think there's enough evidence to prove this and I don't think carbon dating the way they believe it does. In addition, no I don't think they would change completely, minor adjustments and adaptations only take place when need be, not every day, just when they change environments, habitats et. cetera. As to your most recent post, I didn't respond because I hadn't seen this post + I needed to find a lump of time to be able to answer it all.
Also, "I'll keep telling myself that", how do you know you're not doing that with evolution? Instead of believing it because it's proven, you believe it because it seems like the most comfortable thing to believe?