HSC 2017 MX2 Marathon (archive) (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

si2136

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2014
Messages
1,370
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2017 4U Marathon

Are calculators allowed in the 4u test
 

Green Yoda

Hi Φ
Joined
Mar 28, 2015
Messages
2,859
Gender
Male
HSC
2017
Re: HSC 2017 4U Marathon

Prove De Moivre's Theorem by Mathematical Induction where |z|=1
 

TaxiCab1729

New Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2016
Messages
5
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: HSC 2017 4U Marathon

For the first part about the limit:

The best I could come up with was that (based on what my teacher said) is that all exponential functions dominate over all polynomial functions which dominate over all log functions. Therefore, based on the second line of the statement, because both g(t) (the function g denotes that left hand expression just before log(t)) and f(t) = t^a both tend to 0, and f(t) dominates over log(t), it must follow that the limit is true because g(t) also tends to 0 and takes precedence over the log function.

Hopefully that made sense...

I'm still trying to practice on latex - I got the second part but I don't think it technically uses parts...
 

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: HSC 2017 4U Marathon

For the first part about the limit:

The best I could come up with was that (based on what my teacher said) is that all exponential functions dominate over all polynomial functions which dominate over all log functions. Therefore, based on the second line of the statement, because both g(t) (the function g denotes that left hand expression just before log(t)) and f(t) = t^a both tend to 0, and f(t) dominates over log(t), it must follow that the limit is true because g(t) also tends to 0 and takes precedence over the log function.

Hopefully that made sense...

I'm still trying to practice on latex - I got the second part but I don't think it technically uses parts...
You will need to flesh out your explanation more for it to be valid.

The idea is to use the inequalities:



To bound the function behaviour near the origin and squeeze both sides.
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2017 4U Marathon

Like, is anyone even gonna get this?
This is a marathon. They purposely throw in questions that can get overcomplicated. 100% of the time they are doable using just HSC techniques however if it were the HSC exam you'd be guided step by step
 

calamebe

Active Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2015
Messages
462
Gender
Male
HSC
2017
Re: HSC 2017 4U Marathon

If anyone wants a hint, consider the expansion (1+x)^2n and what is is equal to for a), and for b), note that nCk=nC(n-k), and group together the like terms. Do consider the even and odd values of n separately for ease.
 

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: HSC 2017 4U Marathon

If anyone wants a hint, consider the expansion (1+x)^2n and what is is equal to for a), and for b), note that nCk=nC(n-k), and group together the like terms. Do consider the even and odd values of n separately for ease.
There is no need to consider parity cases if you're at that level.
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2017 4U Marathon





And I probably did something wrong.
 

calamebe

Active Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2015
Messages
462
Gender
Male
HSC
2017
Re: HSC 2017 4U Marathon





And I probably did something wrong.
Yeah you left off the squares. Put the squares on, then use the result from a) and you should be fine.

EDIT: Though I don't see a need to break the terms up as you did in the second line. You can do it easily without breaking it up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top