More papers in general or hard questions within the papers (don't know if you have heard of Kurt but his test have a bunch of hard question, till now i just wait for him to explain it and then learn the approach, should I be spending time grinding these hard questions?)Just doing more and more papers for maths honestly. Maths there are so many past papers on websites like THSC online. If you are trying to get better at answering the harder questions then you should do papers from those top schools usually exams from schools like James Ruse, Sydney Grammar etc. tend to be harder than HSC exams so are more useful for that purpose
Personally I did a bit of both. I just did more work all together and in that you come across harder questions as well. Helps with reducing silly mistakes as well if you consistently do all kinds of questions rather than just focusing on the hard ones and exam speed increases if you have done full papers under timed conditions a lot. I would normally try to do like 2 or so papers a week from THSC for maths from those selective or high ranking schools. I think there is some benefit in grinding out the questions as you understand it better if you learnt what works and doesn't but there's a limit to spending too much time on something you can't doMore papers in general or hard questions within the papers (don't know if you have heard of Kurt but his test have a bunch of hard question, till now i just wait for him to explain it and then learn the approach, should I be spending time grinding these hard questions?)
I still don't get how doing more challenging questions is supposed to improve problem solving abilitySo - far from a maths genius but...
I think it'd be disingenuous to simply say do more challenging questions - because that's common sense. That being said, don't overlook the resources that are at your fingertips; textbooks, past papers - Internals & Externals, etc.
Essentially, how I, and many others I know who excel in mathematics (3U&4U) Is having a passion for each challenging question that comes across your eyes. This means approaching the question from multiple angles - or at least trying to. Don't just grind out a question - and throw it away. Ask yourself, is there another way I can do this?
As you said previously, I always like looking at how my classmates approach questions - because being able to holster different ways to tackle a question is really beneficial in an exam; increasing adaptability.
Why?I still don't get how doing more challenging questions is supposed to improve problem solving ability
I literally have nothing to do at the moment finished mod 1 phys and chem so I reckon I'll just spend time grinding out the Kurt tests where I do hard questions until I get them. Will also take your advice and do 1 internals 2U/3U paper every 2nd day in the holidaysPersonally I did a bit of both. I just did more work all together and in that you come across harder questions as well. Helps with reducing silly mistakes as well if you consistently do all kinds of questions rather than just focusing on the hard ones and exam speed increases if you have done full papers under timed conditions a lot. I would normally try to do like 2 or so papers a week from THSC for maths from those selective or high ranking schools. I think there is some benefit in grinding out the questions as you understand it better if you learnt what works and doesn't but there's a limit to spending too much time on something you can't do
What exactly does it do. I get how doing more questions reduces silly mistakes but the chance of getting a hard question similar to the ones being done is minimalWhy?
I don't necessarily agree. Idk about 4U, but there are plenty of skills/tricks that overlap for challenging questions (or general Q's) in 3U.What exactly does it do. I get how doing more questions reduces silly mistakes but the chance of getting a hard question similar to the ones being done is minimal
If the whole point if challenging questions is the tricks/methids to do them , then woudlnt it be best to just learn then from your tutor ?I don't necessarily agree. Idk about 4U, but there are plenty of skills/tricks that overlap for challenging questions (or general Q's) in 3U.
Well that's how i did it. I've never been to tutoring (never will, but that's a whole diff story lmao), so if that suits you best then go for it.If the whole point if challenging questions is the tricks/methids to do them , then woudlnt it be best to just learn then from your tutor ?
Theres a difference between you personally getting a question out yourself and the tutor doing it for you, or even guiding you. Basically try hard questions all by yourself trying every method or thought that comes to mind until you get the answer. Then think to yourself why that path worked whilst the others failed. IMO you should only go to your tutor if you have exhausted all your options to try and find an alternative perspective.If the whole point if challenging questions is the tricks/methids to do them , then woudlnt it be best to just learn then from your tutor ?
Exactly what my tutor said, thanksTheres a difference between you personally getting a question out yourself and the tutor doing it for you, or even guiding you. Basically try hard questions all by yourself trying every method or thought that comes to mind until you get the answer. Then think to yourself why that path worked whilst the others failed. IMO you should only go to your tutor if you have exhausted all your options to try and find an alternative perspective.
Yes and you also have to shift your perspective during an exam. Whilst in practice your sole purpose is to answer all the questions not caring too much about time, in an exam you have to be realistic in how you spend your time (you probably already know this). But many people advise you practice past papers in timed conditions, I don't agree with this, I think you should spend as long as you want (even hours) until you get out a question, atleast in the early stages of your prep.Exactly what my tutor said, thanks
Personally I did a bit of both. I just did more work all together and in that you come across harder questions as well. Helps with reducing silly mistakes as well if you consistently do all kinds of questions rather than just focusing on the hard ones and exam speed increases if you have done full papers under timed conditions a lot. I would normally try to do like 2 or so papers a week from THSC for maths from those selective or high ranking schools. I think there is some benefit in grinding out the questions as you understand it better if you learnt what works and doesn't but there's a limit to spending too much time on something you can't do
So - far from a maths genius but...
I think it'd be disingenuous to simply say do more challenging questions - because that's common sense. That being said, don't overlook the resources that are at your fingertips; textbooks, past papers - Internals & Externals, etc.
Essentially, how I, and many others I know who excel in mathematics (3U&4U) Is having a passion for each challenging question that comes across your eyes. This means approaching the question from multiple angles - or at least trying to. Don't just grind out a question - and throw it away. Ask yourself, is there another way I can do this?
As you said previously, I always like looking at how my classmates approach questions - because being able to holster different ways to tackle a question is really beneficial in an exam; increasing adaptability.
Yes and you also have to shift your perspective during an exam. Whilst in practice your sole purpose is to answer all the questions not caring too much about time, in an exam you have to be realistic in how you spend your time (you probably already know this). But many people advise you practice past papers in timed conditions, I don't agree with this, I think you should spend as long as you want (even hours) until you get out a question, atleast in the early stages of your prep.
Thanks to all the replies, based on your advice iv decided to spent the first half of holidays going for 3U content and doing Kurt tests (will include hard questions)I think the most important attribute is making sure you understand the concepts in depth (as opposed to having a shallow understanding and just rote learning textbook techniques to solve problems). This is essential particularly in Ext2 as simply memorising ways to solve problems doesn’t get you very far.
You will encounter unfamiliar questions where a “textbook” solution does not exist and you are expected to come up with the solution yourself from scratch. Therefore, you must be very confident in properly understanding your material and knowing which concepts to apply (or not apply) to solve a problem.
Fair enough, and I agree nearer to your exam you should definitely do exams in timed conditions. I was mainly talking about when you first start off past papers (atleast for me), if I got the question myself without any outside help I improved much better than looking at the solutions, because I thought of the idea myself. Especially exams like BOS or really difficult exams taking the time to think of each question and trying what works what doesn't was really useful.The whole point of a past paper is an exam that should be done in timed conditions.
Spending however long it takes to work out a question yourself may work for some people but not for me as very often I just couldn't get the problem (mainly 4u). I gave myself a limit of 20-30 minutes and afterwards looked at the solution. But I tried to understand how to do the problem, and afterwards wrote the whole solution out 3 times, or however many it took for me to memorise it. A few days later, and a week later, I would look at the problem, remember how to do it, and glance over the solution. I kept books full of the questions I didn't know how to do at some point, and their worked solutions. (Now I'm having flashbacks of the de moivre questions that were always extra fcking hard for some reason - even though I sucked at 4u in general haha)
It allows you to sort of ‘self discover’ certain properties, methods and develop key insight that may prove relevant to future problems.I still don't get how doing more challenging questions is supposed to improve problem solving ability