MedVision ad

How would you derive the cartesian equation for projectile motion? (1 Viewer)

OreoMcFlurry

Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2021
Messages
40
Gender
Male
HSC
2021
Hey guys,

How would you derive the cartesian equation for projectile motion from the horizontal and vertical accelerations of the object?

In other words, How would you derive the cartesian equation from this step:

x double dot = 0
&
y double dot = -g

(assuming that upwards is positive)
 

Life'sHard

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 24, 2021
Messages
1,101
Gender
Male
HSC
2021
Uni Grad
2025
x dot would just be vcostheta + c

y dot would be -gt + vsintheta + c

To find the constant the question would specify what is occuring at that velocity and time. Same with x and y displacement.

x = vtcostheta + c

y = (gt^2)/2 + vtsintheta + c
 

Valvesound

New Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2020
Messages
23
Gender
Male
HSC
2021
Hey guys,

How would you derive the cartesian equation for projectile motion from the horizontal and vertical accelerations of the object?

In other words, How would you derive the cartesian equation from this step:

x double dot = 0
&
y double dot = -g

(assuming that upwards is positive)
Do what Life'sHard did and then make t the subject in the x component and sub that into the y component
 

OreoMcFlurry

Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2021
Messages
40
Gender
Male
HSC
2021
x dot would just be vcostheta + c

y dot would be -gt + vsintheta + c

To find the constant the question would specify what is occuring at that velocity and time. Same with x and y displacement.

x = vtcostheta + c

y = (gt^2)/2 + vtsintheta + c

So, when integrating from acceleration to velocity (ie. x double dot and y double dot to x dot and y dot respectively), we substitute c with the initial horizontal and vertical velocities. Do we need to write "Initial conditions" to explain why c is the initial velocities or is it not required?
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,642
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Explained slightly differently, the path equation links and . The above answers explain how to get from and to and as functions of , time. You then can find the path by eliminating because you have every point on the path as and so is just a parameter.

For MX1 projectiles, you know the path is a (part of a) parabola and you can find a position at any particular moment by substituting , but to find properties of the path itself, you may need it in Cartesian rather than Parametric forms.

Conceptually, this is the same as taking as a point on a circle centred at and need to interchange with the Cartesian form , which you find by eliminating the parameter .
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,642
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
So, when integrating from acceleration to velocity (ie. x double dot and y double dot to x dot and y dot respectively), we substitute c with the initial horizontal and vertical velocities. Do we need to write "Initial conditions" to explain why c is the initial velocities or is it not required?
Suppose the particle is projected from the origin at time at at an angle to the horizontal:



 

OreoMcFlurry

Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2021
Messages
40
Gender
Male
HSC
2021
Suppose the particle is projected from the origin at time at at an angle to the horizontal:






Thank you so much! I was confused on how to present such info when answering a projectile motion question and this has helped a lot :)
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,642
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Be aware that MX1 methods now tend to treat projectile motion from a vector perspective, in which case the derivation is more like:

Suppose the particle is projected from the origin at time at at an angle to the horizontal. Then the vector for the velocity of projection is . The vectors , , and are the vectors for the acceleration, velocity, and position of the projectile at time .




 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top