just did it pretty simpleRequired to prove: is divisible by 8
careful the 2 isn't squared just do it again and u shud end up with in step 3 (prove for n=k+1) at which point u just prove is divisible by 8 (i did it via mathematical induction)I tried it and couldn't do it either, thought I was ok at induction but apparently not. My working is below if someone is willing to tell me where I went wrong. Also sorry but idk how to use latex
Show true when n=1
= 3^(2x2) - 1
= 3^4 - 1
=80
=8x10 therefore true for n=1
Assume n=k
3^(2k)^2 -1
= 3^(4k^2) -1 = 8P (Where P is an integer)
Show true for when n=k+1
3^[2(k+1)]^2 -1 = 8Q (Where Q is an integer)
LHS = 3^(2k+2)^2 -1
=3^(4k^2+8K+4) -1
=3^(4k^2) x 3^(8k) x 3^(4) -1
= 8P x 81 x 3^(8k) (using line from assume n=k)
??? Idk where to go from here
Not gonna lie, you psyched me out by saying it was "simple", because after investing all my willpower over figuring out how to rearrange such that it is in the form for all integers M I resorted to using a second case of induction like you did. If there is an easier method to this, I'd love to hear it because it's beyond me at the moment.at which point u just prove is divisible by 8 (i did it via mathematical induction)
i'm sure there's an easier way i just wasn't bothered to figure it out so i just did induction againNot gonna lie, you psyched me out by saying it was "simple", because after investing all my willpower over figuring out how to rearrange such that it is in the form for all integers M I resorted to using a second case of induction like you did. If there is an easier method to this, I'd love to hear it because it's beyond me at the moment.
I have to add though, this is a rather unique induction problem. Most MX1 induction problems I do on autopilot, this is the first one that's made me think in a bit.
I was meant to give the students a little test to see if they have learnt how to work out a similar problem from your solution. Sorry for the misinterpreted message.Can use same approach.
I know what we can do. Edit your work and put it under spoiler and just name it answer or solution that should stop them from looking.My apologies!!!
Now students: please don't look at my solution until you have made an honest attempt.
Not gonna lie, you psyched me out by saying it was "simple", because after investing all my willpower over figuring out how to rearrange such that it is in the form for all integers M I resorted to using a second case of induction like you did. If there is an easier method to this, I'd love to hear it because it's beyond me at the moment.
I have to add though, this is a rather unique induction problem. Most MX1 induction problems I do on autopilot, this is the first one that's made me think in a bit.
3^(4k+2) - 1just did it pretty simple
idk what ur having a problem with tho but make sure u prove the stuff that doesn't get multiplied by 8 is divisible by 8 the stuff
alternatively,3^(4k+2) - 1
=(3^(2k+1)-1)(3^(2k+1)+1)
3^(2k+1)= odd number.
(3^(2k+1)-1) = even
(3^(2k+1)+1) = even
For any four consecutive numbers,
there are two even, and two odd numbers, there must also be one even number that is a multiple of 4.
therefore 4x2, divisible by 8.
3^(4k+2) - 1
=(3^(2k+1)-1)(3^(2k+1)+1)
3^(2k+1)= odd number.
(3^(2k+1)-1) = even
(3^(2k+1)+1) = even
For any four consecutive numbers,
there are two even, and two odd numbers, there must also be one even number that is a multiple of 4.
therefore 4x2, divisible by 8.
both work for the question itself. don't even need induction lmao.alternatively,
3^(4k+2) - 1
use x^n-y^n factorisation with 9^(2k+1)-1
to get (8)(....)
titleboth work for the question itself. don't even need induction lmao.
Required to prove: is divisible by 8
I was experimenting with trying to make difficult questions for my own practice and then found that this seemed to work. But then I struggled to prove it lol.where did you get this question from?