i swear you've said something like this to me before
frfrbro ur school literally just be copying 4u questions from the cambridge book and pasting it onto the trial exam
You gotta be specific herelike r there specific methods or techniques for knowing the exact steps to get to ur desired stage?
aint no way Out of all schoolsi swear you've said something like this to me before
frfr
When proving things w lhs and rhs:yeah general proofs
As if Cambridge doesn't copy the HSC lol. Lots of the difficult complex number, integration, mechanics etc. questions in the cambridge book are from past HSCs, mostly from the ends of the pre-2000 exams so students never notice. This is why the current cambridge book doesn't really have very advanced questions for vectors or the expo form of complex numbers (both are new topics)why is the hsc copying cambridge
nono it’s not how to set out proofs it’s more like for some qs i just keep testing shut out till i get to the final thing and it feels like i’m just doing trial and error atp which is annoyingWhen proving things w lhs and rhs:
LHS= .....
=....
=.....= RHS
When proving things that dont have a lhs or rhs,
find what they want you want to prove, and then state 'therefore zxy is ...., (QED)/as required:' maybe below or somewhere in the working.
im pre sure thats the question itself. If you're doing trial and error, maybe you forgot something important in the content to help you solve it? Personally, I can't recall doing proofs for yr 11 ex1 using trial and error (but then again, u spec people probs already finished the whole syllabus by now )nono it’s not how to set out proofs it’s more like for some qs i just keep testing shut out till i get to the final thing and it feels like i’m just doing trial and error atp which is annoying
LMAOno we havent. I’m not talking abt proofs in y11 ext 1 i’m just talking about any topic where the qs needs to prove shit in general(especially when it’s one of those qs where the info given is so discrete and u need extra hard problem solving thinking shit to do it where if u don’t spot one tiny thing ull never be able to do the q)im pre sure thats the question itself. If you're doing trial and error, maybe you forgot something important in the content to help you solve it? Personally, I can't recall doing proofs for yr 11 ex1 using trial and error (but then again, u spec people probs already finished the whole syllabus by now )
well yea, but theres many ways you can approach proof qns so it doesnt neccessarily just depend on 'spotting one tiny thing'.LMAOno we havent. I’m not talking abt proofs in y11 ext 1 i’m just talking about any topic where the qs needs to prove shit in general(especially when it’s one of those qs where the info given is so discrete and u need extra hard problem solving thinking shit to do it where if u don’t spot one tiny thing ull never be able to do the q)
yeah but the HSC taking questions from a textbook is next level,As if Cambridge doesn't copy the HSC lol. Lots of the difficult complex number, integration, mechanics etc. questions in the cambridge book are from past HSCs, mostly from the ends of the pre-2000 exams so students never notice. This is why the current cambridge book doesn't really have very advanced questions for vectors or the expo form of complex numbers (both are new topics)
listen mr i wont give anyone my economics resources because im greedyaverage bio student
idk it’s just a sorta intuition eventually, if you do enough proofs you’ll just kinda know how ur gonna prove it, most of the time they are a sorta easier question to set you up for the harder final part of the question. You also have to make sure you know all of your identities really wellLMAOno we havent. I’m not talking abt proofs in y11 ext 1 i’m just talking about any topic where the qs needs to prove shit in general(especially when it’s one of those qs where the info given is so discrete and u need extra hard problem solving thinking shit to do it where if u don’t spot one tiny thing ull never be able to do the q)
aiming for it doesn’t mean anything until I actually achieve itsays the guy aiming for state rank and 99.9 +
instead of 99.9 and state rank in mx1 he gets 99.95 and state rank in all his subswe all know you will
no bc i am in dire need of eco resources asw plslisten mr i wont give anyone my economics resources because im greedy
I dont even do bio as you can see from my signature i love the arts
pls chill with the expectationswe all know you will