Hi all,
Just clarifying if this is the correct way to set out induction proofs (this is how I've done it all through high school):
(A) Consider n = 1:
prove base case
(B) Assume true for n = k:
rewrite given statement for k instead of n
Consider n = k + 1:
ie. RTP <what I need to prove with n = k + 1>
proof --insert assumption somewhere obviously
Conclusion: therefore by (A), (B), and the process of Mathematical Induction, TRUE
Is this fine??
THANKS
Just clarifying if this is the correct way to set out induction proofs (this is how I've done it all through high school):
(A) Consider n = 1:
prove base case
(B) Assume true for n = k:
rewrite given statement for k instead of n
Consider n = k + 1:
ie. RTP <what I need to prove with n = k + 1>
proof --insert assumption somewhere obviously
Conclusion: therefore by (A), (B), and the process of Mathematical Induction, TRUE
Is this fine??
THANKS