is this worth trying to understand?ruse 2020
is this worth trying to understand?ruse 2020
tbh it probably wont show up, but given that there was something similar in the math adv hsc (2022 q29) i would just say give the question a go its not too badis this worth trying to understand?
what, istg i do not remember learning anything like that at all. Which topic is this from? I need to check to see it.tbh it probably wont show up, but given that there was something similar in the math adv hsc (2022 q29) i would just say give the question a go its not too bad
its a mix of proof an integration and im pretty sure its in cambridgewhat, istg i do not remember learning anything like that at all. Which topic is this from? I need to check to see it.
nope i believe thats under induction.View attachment 44974
Would it fall under this dot point from the syllabus?
Alright, imma just have to hope it doesn't show up.nope i believe thats under induction. View attachment 44975
it probably falls under this one but idk im not a syllabus slave never looked at this thing before tbh
prepare for the worst and hope for the bestAlright, imma just have to hope it doesn't show up.
got anything in mind?The last few years have had complex numbers, proofs and mechanics for question 16c, wonder if it'll be vectors this year?
i think so if you can make sure you drop almost no marks in questions 11-15, so that if you flunk multi choice and 16 you can still have the possibility of a score of 70-75 and an E4Is not doing question 16 a conceivable strategy
Actually, there are often parts in Q16 that are easy marks. For example, suppose a question has two parts where part (i) is a hard proof but part (ii) is hence deduce this using part (i). In many cases, part (ii) is quite easy so you can just skip straight to that to get some free marks.Is not doing question 16 a conceivable strategy
LITERALLY what i was thinking for nearly every paper i've done so far omgIs not doing question 16 a conceivable strategy
same, at least with those i know where to start prrofs can sometimes be the most whack shit i've ever seenHoping for mechanics or integration for question 16. Proof would make me a very sad boy
no for real especially the ones with so much inequalities and stupid sigmassame, at least with those i know where to start prrofs can sometimes be the most whack shit i've ever seen
every practice paper I've done, I've always skipped q16 its just not doable rn.LITERALLY what i was thinking for nearly every paper i've done so far omg