yea english is the BANE of every math student's existenceyeah probably in 4u maths i do, but tbh english is really dragging me down - i think i'm average at best, and i also dont think i can study it early lmao
yea english is the BANE of every math student's existenceyeah probably in 4u maths i do, but tbh english is really dragging me down - i think i'm average at best, and i also dont think i can study it early lmao
yeah true, also i have high functioning autism (diagnosed very recently) so that might be why im kinda bad at communications and stuff but good with patterns in maths... its honestly just a theory tho and also im pretty sure my condition is mildyea english is the BANE of every math student's existence
interestingyeah true, also i have high functioning autism (diagnosed very recently) so that might be why im kinda bad at communications and stuff but good with patterns in maths... its honestly just a theory tho and also im pretty sure my condition is mild
yeah no worries i might just speak it out rather than writing the whole thing bc i cant be askedI aint doubting you alright don't get the wrong idea here but can u try to solve this problem if you can I got it from a 4U textbook
View attachment 46276
also is this from cambridge? Im pretty sure i saw a similar questionI aint doubting you alright don't get the wrong idea here but can u try to solve this problem if you can I got it from a 4U textbook
View attachment 46276
waaw u seem to know ur stuff d/w i understood it a bit like you I did also teach myself a bit of calculusyeah no worries i might just speak it out rather than writing the whole thing bc i cant be asked
a) Use integration by parts, with one of the parts being x^n u and the other term being v' (the mentality here is that we want to reduce the power of n to n-1 using differentiation so that we can achieve the T_n-1 which is specified in the question. this should evaluate nicely (this is a standard q im pretty sure)
b) we can evaluate T_0 (simple reverse chain rule). then sub n=1 into (a) and then we get T_1 and then we sub that back in recursively and we go up to T_3
c) apply the formula recursively so basically just use the rule on T_n-1 in part (a) and then again on T_n-2 and so on until u get to T_0 which u know and can sub in (i know that explanation was a bit weird so lemme know if u need more)
yep that's rightalso is this from cambridge? Im pretty sure i saw a similar question
oh nice! lol self teaching is defo the way to go with mathswaaw u seem to know ur stuff d/w i understood it a bit like you I did also teach myself a bit of calculus
thnx although I never went to the extent you did (lack of discipline) so props to youoh nice! lol self teaching is defo the way to go with maths
Me 2 i believe it even though it is a bit unbelievable it definitely isn't impossible like for example look at terrence tao man learnt calculus at like 5 or some shitImagine this is rage bait.
Although i think i believe it