hence by mathematical induction, if 'dagwoman is gay' is true, 'dagwoman is a total ignorant carpet munching fag' is also true, therfore n true for all 2,3,4 etc for all n > 1
@glitter:
I didnt say it had to be something romantic, i just meant indicative of _something_. i.e. it could indicate her friendship with him(the ex) is greater than his caring/relationship for his new girlfriend
but fireflower, theres no denying some care for each other is involved i mean, the amount of time spent with / spent talking to someone is indicative of _something_ isnt it?
"i already agreed that people without heads cant eat sandwhiches in terms of putting food inside their mouth. they can however, eat sandwhichs, and they can eat, as i dont believe eating is limited between food and mouths"