Recent content by englishessayssuck

bruh that gives more incomplete combustion

anyway guys let's make the most of today and start studying some physics oops I barely know anything from doing chem the past few weeks

like I guess the esterification knowledge could still be partially used for the last question explaining the reaction conditions like I did but it was tad too overkill even for the 7 marker and the response felt really out of balance with the idk 2 pages of esterification thing

and the other half the time we were trying to write practicals up in such a way as to get the "A" grade which barely any of us got in the end people in our class would profoundly relate to this

not the person u asked but I attend one of those 2 listed schools and half the time we literally just did practicals

ikr all those sodium stearates and sulfonate/ammonium heads and those nonionic thingos

also where were the questions on soap/detergents, bioethanol and biodiesel or any of those polymers or any of those colours of precipitation reactions or flame tests or anything

dw you'll def band 6, and soz if I caused any confusion

it was probably 1 equation nvm

oh well I was banking on them setting a Cycasin question today so that I could troll and draw the structural formula same xd

I thought it wouldn't be a bad idea to add some more detail to my response while I was at it, but yeah they only really asked for one (or two? was that a different q?) equation/s

like I used a lot of space to properly define the bronsted lowry theory (and all the acid and conjugate base stuff), had an example of both, used the NH4Cl as an example of a Bronsted Lowry reaction (which isn't arrhenius, thus generalising it) and also the disadvantages as per above (and of...

yeah that and the sulfur trioxide reaction with calcium oxide

I also did the quadratic formula method just to make sure the answer agrees with the "estimated" one (by a lot of decimal points), so probably no chance that will lose a mark (assuming of course you set out the quadratic equation properly idk) they'll probably be looking more to see if people...

yeah whichever way around it was oops