Lol, fair enough. At least people found one or the other easy lol
Nope, it actually did occur. Marker might think you have an in-depth knowledge ;)
But you did have to refer to the guaze somewhere.
Same here !!, I went along with consolidation of power as most of my preparation was focused around the first part of the syllabus. You were not completely confined to Lenin, you could also bring in Trotsky and the Kronstadt sailors so yeah plenty to discuss :)
Yeh i wrote like 4.5 for each essay, dont worry especially if you write small like me. If all your content is good and answers the question you should still manage to get a band 6.
Yeh i was thinking the same.
However, i think that due to the CPI going up the value of those 'deposits' in terms of what you can purchase is reduced. Assets on the other hand such as land should increase accordingly with the CPI. I THINK thats the angle they took. But idk any other thoughts...
I find it a bit funny that just above this post you clearly stated "There is no debate":D
About your first post, Serbia which was a part of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and after WWII gained little or no territory, rather the Partisans under Tito (who wasn't Serbian by the way)...
Please take your nationalistic bullshit somewhere else. If you have nothing smart to contribute then stay away.
History Extension is a subject that revolves around objectivity and exploring both sides of the argument.
I initialy thought about doing Jugolslavija but, it's too much of a risk.
The break-up is still a pretty sensitive topic with strong views. Even though its not "professional" some teachers who have strong views may disagree with your point of view which as bad as it sounds might lead to you...
You pretty much had to compare the ballroom world with the toledo milk bar.
Ones all fancy and shit the other one is more natural and realistic "where do you feel the rythem" and shit like that.
But it was a pretty shit question. Did not word it as good as i would have liked to :(