Recent content by Suspense

I doubt it. The history papers have been quite easy this year. Modern was straight forward, and I hear ancient was too. No need to go messing with the kids who do extension!

I hope it's not as specific as aims + purposes, although worse would be to get something like 2002 (or maybe it was 2001) asking to compare between your view and the source's, as well as looking at other historians.

I've read about 2 things out of the source book. On the whole they're pretty crap as they waffle on and on and rarely get to a decent point.

Was the ancient exam on Wednesday or today?

Ancient? Modern? Both?

Never done it before and I'll eat my computer if it happens tomorrow. There's 20 something case studies so they'd have to go through and do that for each one. If they do, I'm screwed as I've only learnt 2 out of the 4 (or is it 5??) issues in mine.

You should try and do 3, with minor references to others if possible.

I've got no idea what the history wars are and it doesn't matter what the source is or where it comes from. You'll always find the same core areas of debate on historiography so why try to predict what the actual source will be??

History wars??

Is question 2 not entirely about context vs evidence shaping historians' perspectives? You need to look at the different periods in which the historians wrote. I don't know anything about your case study but I'll try and explain it with mine. The key historians we've looked at with...

You're fucked. That's probably one of the big 4 questions they could ask about Germany. Do you not know the major causes or is it detail and historians you are lacking?

I bombed the 4U exam but I think I got about 70/84 for this so I'm happy!

Graphing is always a "gimme" topic :)

If you people thought that was easy, you need to get out more. Can't wait to hit the pub this saturday!

I didn't say which one I was doing. It didn't say that you needed to unlike section 3.