• WARNING: Teachers and publishers browse this site as well. Do NOT plagiarise. Do NOT upload copyrighted content. You will get caught.
  • Finished your HSC? Check out our University Discussion, Non-School forums or help out next year's HSC students!
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
  • You must be a registered member to download resources
bcv

Why we all aren't exempt from propaganda - PIP

Please register/sign in to download!
Overview Reviews (3)
hardstuck10th
The Propaganda PIP ( response aimed to analyze the use of propaganda in media, but it ultimately missed the mark.

Firstly, the research was superficial. While it touched on key examples, it failed to delve deeply into the psychological effects of propaganda on audiences or the techniques used to manipulate perceptions. A more thorough exploration of case studies would have added significant value.

Additionally, the presentation lacked cohesion. The flow between sections was disjointed, making it difficult to follow the main argument. Visual aids, while present, were not effectively integrated, which detracted from the overall impact of the response.

Furthermore, the analysis of counterarguments was minimal. Addressing opposing views could have strengthened the overall argument and showcased critical thinking skills.

Overall, while the project had potential, it needed more depth and clarity to truly engage with the topic of propaganda effectively.
bcv
bcv
Thank you for the feedback, I appreciate the honesty. Firstly, the research I used clearly stated the techniques used by media to radicalise individuals; echochambers (Chapter 2), fearmongering (Chapter 3), emotional manipulation (Chaper 1/2/3), conspiracy theories (Chaper 3), glorification of radicalised individuals (Chaper 2), etc. these all dived into the psychological effect. Secondly, the presentation lacked cohesion because I intented Chapters 1 to 3 to be their own individual theme and this PIP was made to research a topic, not to argue a point. The visual aids were for my markers. Lastly, my teachers advised me not to address opposing views as it this project was to once again, explore a topic, not argue it. I'm sorry if you felt as though I was not specific or deep enough, it could have been because of the word count restraint. I understand why you do not like this PIP, but giving it one star feels harsh, thank you nonetheless! Have a great day.
Solarised
I don't do this subject but good👍
bcv
bcv
thanks mate, i appreciate it
Y
hell yeah
bcv
bcv
love you
Top