Search results

you don't need historiography for WWI

You should paraphrase historian's ideas and discuss how it affects your argument. There's no point in just 'name-dropping' or putting in quotes without explaining their relevance.

It's been a while since they've asked for different interpretations of the personality, hasn't it? I really dislike those types of questions (had it in the trial though so i wouldn't be unprepared aha)

You'll get the top exam mark as your internal mark. Then you get your own exam mark. Add the two together and divide by 2 to get the overall hsc mark

I doubt they would ever specifically ask a question on it, since it is part of the case study (where everyone does different ecosystems). Just talk about about the atmosphere, hydrosphere etc lol

I try to have 1-2 on each dot point for the national study. In regards to the personality study, I've organised the historians into positve/negative/neutral view.

Have fun!

around 80

94.75

http://community.boredofstudies.org/showthread.php?t=67969 http://community.boredofstudies.org/showthread.php?t=1590

Didn't realise we were considering every variable possible, mate. Although I have my Math exam tomorrow, the vast majority of my weekend has been used to study modern and geography. So I guess that means that you're answer is invalid? :P I find the shorter topics (WWI and the personality...

It shouldn't be as difficult to memorise the content now, since you will have already studied parts of it during the year.

haven't even studied the 'conflict in europe' yet lol

Ken Webb Buy his shit.

This

nope

I reckon another essay will be based on a local economic enterprise

accompanied by the quotes:

dude of course you can get over 100, you've proven it yourself. Aaron is the real troll here

defs 5%