Search results

the essays more researchy than text booky iwr - why not just pick a question (like bill of rights), find a few relevant journal articles (preferably short if ur pressed for time) on the agis plus txt database and write ur argument tomorrow? don't stress man, i'm sure u'll pull it off

i would LOVE for them to change our current GPA system i've got two 74s for law, mostly D's and a few decent HD's (for the law GPA only - i suck at economics)- but by macian logic i may as well have two 65's and 75s for the rest - it just seems kind of harsh to cock up ur gpa so badly over a...

have u guys checked out those chuck norris/jack bauer sites? they're so lame and funny. and bauer would totally pawn norris.

i TANKED it wrote the wrong interest for the prob question (i don't know what possessed me to call alana's interest a fee simple) and stuffed the essay so hard no time i only mentioned 3/4 theories even though i said all of them in the intro, didn't go into the cases, didn't even say the point...

and i think what u were saying in ur last bit 'moved along to registration' - i think that's relevant for eg when: there are 2 otherwise equitable interests - say a first in time mortgage (who lodges theirs for registration first) and a second in time bona fide purchase of the property for...

as i understand it... it's not got anything to do with registered people - people were having problems after the introduction of the torrens system because in the period after someone had honestly paid their money and entered into valid contracts, they were still treated as only an equitable...

lol yeah i know what u mean sometimes its good though when ur subconcious works stuff out for u in ur sleep and u wake up understanding something u were confused about

oh and thanks for the tip iwr i ended up just doing that - using the lecture slides and crapping on about how characterisation's purposive now - so thanks for that!

thank u my darlings i did end up 'finishing' though it was 10 mins late in and 700 words short. at least it's done!!

yup - that's what i did too. side note: ARRRRRHHHHHHHH save me! i've only done 80 words for the external affairs question, it's nearly 11 and it confuses the crap out of me. bloody confusing interpretation/characterisation distinction why do u hate me?

i know - judicial parsimony - but they still need to interpret it if its scope is not clear did u talk about the punitive/nonpunitive distinction in part 1?

characterisation and interpretation are quite interrelated i think first u do a general characterisation test to see whether the law can be seen to fall within any head of power, then u interpret the scope of the power and then characterise the law more fully to see whether the law in...

it's pretty straight forward i guess first u look at what heads it could fall under - either the defence power s51(6) or the implied nationhood power (B&W, p. 534). the look at the scope - whole 'waxes and wanes' thing - decide if it will be broadened in light of terrorism then it's a test of...

how are u guys starting it? that's my main problem - how to start!!!

and belinda the answer to the 'what' answer can be seen as controversial, so u can still argue what u think there

lol i'm in ur boat iwr, still haven't finished the readings or started writing. i keep getting distracted by interesting and almost related stuff on the net - like parliamentary brawls and kirbs paying out the hc for whatever reason. lol the judges are so dramatic. kirbs thinks mchugh's an...

oh right - u mean that implied nationhood has restrictions... sorry i'm half asleep. there would be restrictions to both powers wouldn't there?

ooo we have a new member! hi belinda!! u're the first new person we've had to 3rd yr mac law discussions since i think first year! i wish i could answer ur question but not quite up to that bit yet... but why would nationhood power be a restriction?

i'm doing external affairs and defence

just one thing my little revolutionaries - it's quite annoying if u're gone for under 10 mins, like to the toilet or out for a quick smoke to come back and find someone's usurped ur position because they couldn't be arsed either looking around for a free table (which is not easy to find) or...