Search results

Isn't a tort against something that deals with a duty of care, not an act or omission which harms someone? I still maintain the manufacturer had a duty of a care in this case to make sure the cereal was free of crappy metal bits, regardless of whether they hurt someone. I think before the...

4 and 5 were shockers

do you think it would've been better to do an additional society or historial society? I'm glad I did the extra historial society.

I think Mega Cities is the definite favourite. That was by far the best question!

I used 10+8+8, 28 pages. Nice generic essay questions = scrawl.

lol I did reservoir manager too, and I checked possible water contamination as water levels. That was such a crappy question.

as for subject choices, methinks I shouldn't have done Ancient, Modern and Legal. thank heavens for the simplicity of Geography, although it was fucked on the same day as Legal...

it is definitely tort. You have to remember that question is meant to apply to everyone in the Legal Course, and only that area under the Law and Society section. The people who answered contract law, I can see where you're coming from - that was my 'backup' answer - but on the 'balance of...

same. I had extradition, ICC and dealing with it through the laws of Australia and/or other jurisdictions.

I'm hoping for a mark higher than 90 too, but fat chance as I have virtually no time to study... let's hope I get some friendly markers.

Loved it too, though my favourite was definitely the Hellenistic period section, as the questions were SO good!

I'm going to take a wild guess that you all do an extra Society?

5 4 10

Im a fan of 'The RIme of the Ancient Mariner' and 'Fried Green TOmatoes' :D

5 also. Geog, Legal (same day) Ancient (day before) 2 English exams

OMG someone else is doing the Hellenistic period???

how about: 'panic because the Geography exam will be starting just over an hour'

11/15 for the trial, I'm aiming for 13-15 in the HSC (I have put in so much extra work it's not funny) But good luck with you, just remember to constantly talk about the concept and techniques. NEVER recount. EVER. If the worst comes to worst, just talk about how the text shows change without...

must be hazy - his name was 'Toonen' and he was in breach of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)

I don't know the particulars of the Brandy case, but I just refer to it as the 'Brandy decision', and talk about it whenever I mention HREOC. Basically, this decision meant that HREOC decisions were not legally enforceable by themselves. However, they can attempt to anforce their decisions...