Search results

you can download dvd quality movies with bit torrent - they're just like 4 gigs is all

guys, it verged on fucking terrible - at least independance day had a bounty of corny will smith lines - all this had was sweet CGI and an absolutely awful story line.

usyd has pretty buildings, a shitload of grass and is almost as close to CBD as UTS... (plus all the stuff it has on campus, ie banks, post office, bars, cafes, aquatic centre, gym.... all things)

hey whatdoyouknow, i also lost my major work the night before it was due cause of a corrupted disk - fucking gods and their sense of humour (keep backups! seriously!~)

monty python and hitchhikers are genius, pratchet is jus trash fantasycomedy

im determined to ruin all your fun here -marsden is a way average writer- all his books followed the exact same formula, shat me no end at the time- and i was what, like 11? what's with all you guys recommending such 12 year old books? i can't really argue grug tho.

narnia is not THAT good when you're old, james patterson is fairly trashy, and hitchhikers guide is FAR FAR FAR too long for a first time reader (as gold as it is) as long as it is, i would personally recommend catch 22- every page is fantastic.

did anyone here get in?

the best way to get a good title when you can't think of one, is to just ask as many people as you can- eventually someone will accidently give you one you really like... i know i'd never have been able to name mine otherwise...

ive read several discworlds, and enjoyed them quite a bit. gut generally theyr'e pretty low quality, tending to use the same jokes in different situations again and again...

i do molecular biology, but my one friend did nutrition, and her course was pretty much identical to mine first year. you got to do a specific advanced chem, whatever math you like, whatever bio you like and another science of your choosing. depending on what math/bio you do gauges how hard it...

thank you.

hehe, you're silly. the percentiles are only for UMAT, ie. the three parts of. we never get any interview feedback (now that pissed me off)

my lowest percentile was 96

a technical definition like that doesn't translate to reality.

oh please, throwing in definitions doesn't win you an argument- ill refuse to ever admit that the art of using different chemical reactions (all that genetic engineering is) constitutes as engineering.

this was for unsw, and by excellent umating i mean i did excellently in umat. for my rants on prep courses check the med part of the unsw section... too tired to repeat

my tale of medicine woe... 98.85 uai, excellent UMATing, didn't get in sheerly cause of the interview... i reckon its cause i have absolutely zero extra curricular activities, and they probably saw through my lies of sport and charity- so if you don't have to, dont lie at the interview! from...

perhaps it could be that the study of genes is scientific? it has absolutely nothing to do with engineering- engineering is just the term used to help people understand that scientists are 'building' genes.

i haven't been to those seminar things for aaaaaaages, and was wondering if ron gave us any info for this essay aside from in the first seminar?