Search results

would u guys think that a low 70's raw would scale to a band 5 this year?... i actually found the test moderate,, hope i get a scaled band 5 *crosses fingers*

fuken hell cunt... calm down,, u missed one question.. seriously other cunts missed out half the paper... the kid next to me just sat there for 3 hours and wrote 3 words (im not exagerating) FFS get over it...you will do fine, probably better than most people (including me), and CHIGGA!!

Re: Who have Chemistry LASt? YEA!!!! CHEM IS MY LAST ONE GRATS to you all... except the fools who have exams up till wednesday =.=" PITY THE FOOL YA'LL

Re: wow, possibly the easiest thing ive done ROFLMOA!! brilliant :D

Re: Fish? LOL were they screwing around with you, or did they actually mention the different kinds of fish ?! :p u got punked hardcore dude

Re: wow, possibly the easiest thing ive done ROFL!! woah man your so skilled... YOU PICKED UP ON THE METAPHOR!! i cant believe it... i sat in the exam room thinking about the kinds of fish i should mention... (cos your so smart maybe you picked up on the sarcasm) i will certainly let you...

u guys seem really confident... im gonna be a pessimist and say part 1- 20/25 part 2- 19-20/25 part 3- 21/25 part 4- 20/25 so 80% raw im looking at to be my best result i can hope for imo.... however that being said im happy about the paper.. and 80% would be great for me :D

hmmm yea the test was good... overall i cant complain about anything except the pain im feeling in my rigth hand now >< the leni question was good,, very good... the national studies on germany i think was the trickiest,, however it was quite simple once you actually thought about it... and the...

cool thx man thats really helpful... so confusing cos both sides are putting forward pretty strong arguments... and plus i seem to have lost the question sheet so i cant read over it again (plus i dont want to :P)

im a 0.3 person... but seriously,, this is getting out of hand,, so many replies for one question... could someone possibly get a response from a teacher?! or are there any mods in uni browsing this thread that could help us out here? WE NEED A DEFINITE ANSWER!! i can see the logic from...

contradiction = zero mista chin clearly stated that in the marking of our trials...

lower temp means LOWER resistance due to the fact that there are less electron vibrations in the lattice... am i right or wrong here? i get the part about "is copper a superconductor?", i just went with the flow... the previous question was on super conductors.... low temps are required for...

YOUR DAYS ARE OVER MAN! WIGGA

LOL!!! biggest mistake of your life was to say zero!... well maybe not biggest,, being a bos prostitute is also quite questionable... rofl this thread has made my day :P

ROFL NOOBS!! who said it got smaller?!! seriously this was one of the easier questions in the paper,,, 0.3m is correct,, the bogans got pwned by this one it seems..

Quanta to Quarks was easy this year.... the 7 mark question was a bit hard to get out but once you started writing it seemed easy...... the only part i found really hard to answer was the cyclotron thing one... thats probably cos i didnt really study it or go over it.... other than that Q 2...

arghh... i just used the formula... at 8 amps.. man scrwed up this question hardcore i did everything except minus the weight of the rod.. everything would be wrong after that... dammit

hmmm the test was easy.... however i think ill probably end up with raw mark of around 70 upward... fuked up those stupid calculations on the copper rod thing >< and judging from friends responses after the test and most of you guys,,, im guessing that 70 will not amount to a band 5 this...

personally for me the module c power plays question was one of the tricky ones.... lol so i just decided, heck why not just discuss all my texts, and then say based on the perspectives of power represented, i have only ebraced some! LOL i hope that goes down well for the markers... hopefully...

ROFL!!!! this thread delivers...