Search results

TWI is just an exchange rate... so like any appreciation, it would make imports cheaper but exports more expensive.. ie less internationally competitive now terms of trade is about PRICES... so if our TOT decreased then import prices are rising relative to export prices... so it doesnt...

well demand for $A has increased which would mean that demand for exports (coz we have to be paid in $A)... and imports need to be financed in $US so that constituts supply... so the answer would be B i think

autonomous investment: Business investment expenditures that are unrelated to income or production (especially national income or gross national product). These are investment expenditures that would occur even if national income was zero. Autonomous investment is graphically depicted as the...

haha i knew they werent right anyway lol!! as i said.. 4.5 is extremely high..

thanks.. MFP sounds a bit high though.. it only ever increased to like 3.5 and that was when there was heaps of gains from MER :S bahh who knows anymore

on the topic of productivity.. does anyone have any recent labour productivity stats? and MFP stats??

dont forget its part of the marking criteria for the 2nd essay.. ie "economic data"... my teacher penalised me because i didnt have enough stats... even though i had more than enough.

keynesian deflationary/inflationary gap.... takes a little while to understand though!!

we were either on the same wavelength during that question or sharing a brain.. soundslike we got the same content.. i used kershaw too lol and Fest, and a few others but yeh

yep... thats what i meant, and our teacherwould do that in internal exams.. but up until last year when she was marking hsc they werent taking marks off.. she said they might this year though. and they dont give half marks so that'd be bad if i didnt put them :|

welll ill agree with the people who are saying quoting adds credibility... i like to quote historians but wat is quite useless is say... quoting someone from the time who isnt a source, just for the sake of it and saying thats historiography.. but yeh quoting means something. my teacher...

yep u should go well.. sounds like part of my essay. i used the same basis for my trial and got a gud mark for it.. and ive seen some sample exemplars b4 that start with Friedrich's 6 point thing :)

now that im thinking about it im trying to remember whether i put in the subscripts.. coz apparently they were gonna start taking marks off for that too!! im pretttty sure i put it but cant remember now! argh

finally someone who understands it!!.. ive been trying to tell people i know for a while that it isnt using quotes from the time, rather about giving historians opinions particularly contrasting ones.

can i just say, just coz something is easy doesnt mean that people are going to go well.. the standards they expect are fairly high and alot of schools dont mark to that standard anymore.. and alot of times i find people saying they find things easy, and you know what marks they end up with? 70%...

i did, and it only sounds like a few other people.. sounds like the majority of the people ive talked to from my school and everything just did a straight out Le Chat. type of thing rather than an initial increase in volume of all reactants.

the paper, in comparison to previous years, was probably either the same level or slightly harder in my opinion.. loooking back at the past years' questions for the sections i did they were quite alot easier and maybe not so intricate as this years ones.. like Cold War.... that second question...

as i mentioned in another thread (i think its the national studies/personality one) "public life" is defined to be about being in the civil service and in the government.. that type of thing.. so i outlined his accession into the nazi party, how he came to be at the centre of power...

i basically focused on the policies and how they added to the cold war tensions and exacerbated.. drawing on my Berlin crisis stuff but always going back to the overall cold war.. BUT i didnt argue that they were totally responsible... i said the US had a role to play in causing the cold war as...

1 entry found for public life. public life n. Public service or a term of public service by an appointed or elected official. for those of you who are debating the public life thing.... thats the dictionary definition.... and if you do legal studies, public means GOVERNMENT... so yeh...