Search results

oh one thing.. could they ask us to do prescribed text only for the question?

"altering the original form, in r&g, removal of hamlet's soliloquies eliminates the rational reasonging for his behavior. His sarcastic witticisms are recontextualised, juxtaposed with 29th century idioms. Elizabethan language sounds pretentious..."

it's definitely quality, not quantity.. i've seen ppl write 8-pg a4 essays and not get into top band.

okay.. is it just me or has anyone else been totally spooked by the exemplar responses? I know they're supposed to be exemplar, but do we seriously have to write like that to get top marks? i'm referring in particular to the hamlet/rosnguild one...

the type of learning u'll do is quite similar to prelim phys - not that many calculations (but enough).. but there's much more emphasis on the social aspects of physics - how this and this impacts society and the environment, the advantages, disadvantages of this and this. basically it's a LOT...

it's about how there was the telephone system being set up - but long distance phone calls were seriously limited cuz of the available technology... and then bardeen, brattain and shockley increased the understanding of semiconductor materials.. and shockley invented the transistor.. jacaranda's...

the CSSA trial is a bit dodgy on the whole.. for the first q u could have gotten the two marks by explaining 2 different aspects - eg how it releases chlorine atoms which catalyse the conversion of ozone to oxygen, not just identifying that it destroys ozone. and that ozone acts as a uv...

arghhhhh.......... my body system's starting to play up.... =P i've had hiccups for the last couple of days... they stop for an hour or so then start up again.. ARgh! i'm sick of holding my breath... and i've drunk enough water/tea to drown a whale. hsc is very scary. and i'm gonna be soooooo...

yep~! thank you =)

lol.. u dont' need to understand anythin for hsc... *sigh.. it's based on memorising history =P

arghh~~!!! that's actually very creepy... because i can so imagine myself in such a situation... >.< m u s t r e l a x . . . .

argh.. positive?? *stress paranoia

the crucible is very good =)

we dont' have to know it do we??? or have i been totally duped??!?! the dot point was taken out this year? or last year...

yeah it didn't work in trial tho.. i used a ticker timer job with a trolley and whatnot.. argh i'm whinging sorry.. it's the stress ^^

what's the difference between equivalence point and end point? and when u titrate, do u look for an indicator that suits the equivalence point or end point? thanks all..

*argh! someone~!! please take pity on me~!! *needing a projectile motion prac very badly... =P

u know for subjects like chem and phys - for short answer they give u a lil space with lines to write in? if i write outside the lines, will the markers read it?

ah right right =) thank you very much

i'm not rahul but i hope this is okay it IS lenz's law remember lenz's law - the current will be induced to OPPOSE the change in flux ie to OPPOSE the movement of the coil. use right-hand rule with a force acting AGAINST the coil's motion. that's induced current.