Search results

and on another note good luck to all first year commerce students tomorrow.....accounting i think will be alright

for most classes it is pass the finals and achieve a mark about 50 overall....you pass the class....but like for accounting it is more consideration...you need to get about 50 or really close, and you need to make a satisfactory attempt at all assessments other subjects have their own rules...

i dont think they post exam answers on mycourse, i asked for other subjects and the lecturers just said come and see them and they will go through it with u

its in i think week 13 lectures....investments i dont think are covered in the exam....but the process to do the dividends are...like most of that stuff is from the perspective of blog, not whinge, so this puts a different perspective all together i think a similar question popped up in one...

well i replied in webct.....so i should reply here also :P well i thought exactly as you did nekkid when i did then exam....but then i looked at the lecture notes for the week when we covered owners' equity with diane, and we actually did go over most of the stuff that is asked in the exam

well dont you like need to pass the exam to pass the course anyway? cause like isnt it for most subjects to pass the course you must pass the final...and get a total mark above 50?

well a subject which should be even easier to get a HD in is micro....

i found it pretty crap...i didnt finish....but i ended up passing (very very close) so thats an ok thing

aaaah this practise set really sucks ##### dont you all agree???

look it is always up to the individual style of the essay writer....but a generic outline for an economics essay would be probably what your teacher said....sounds like good advice

im in uni now...and u probably didnt need to know those stuff to get a good mark in the HSC :)

okay looks like my help aint needed here after Demandred's post :O

well who here is actually doing augustus and the julio-claudians as a subject? it may seem to be bad when compared to the fall of the republic, it is still a really interesting time period studing...(this coming from past experiance :P)

those HSC Excel books are not that good for history in general a good summary of the subject is the pamela bradley series there are many ways to study for ancient...you need notes right? the best study is always personal note taking covering all aspects of the syllabus, and then have past...

hopefully it not going to be as bad as i think it might be.... HOPES FAITHFULLY

how can u hate micro? it is the easiest subject im doing!....so far HD average :D yeah i remember him saying something about it...then again he told me what he thinks handball is....it aint my handball

have to agree there....she's really HOT :cool: there a soo many hot ppl out there...all you have to do is look

would you really talk about tutmosis III? cause he's not in this time period...and one of my friends got severely penalised by discussing stuff outside the time period

how much information do you have....i.e. historical sources, information etc obviously homer is going to be a vital source, and virgil, and other writer of and about the trojan period....btw...is your question on the topic or on the nature of the historical sources?

lol fall of the republic...yeah the civil war and the exciting part of political manuevering during the first triumvirate is interesting....but i reckon that the rise of the principate is also quite interesting i did forget to add the punic wars and the fall of the empire....now that is...